JustASleuth wrote:Thank you for your opinion, no bubble burst. You all can keep denying the obvious. I'm communicating with other specialists that aren't involved in this forum or other forums. It's their daily job.
I watched the Youtube video today. Thank you. I don't understand it well, so I don't have a lot to add on that end. I will say this about Anthony ...... he was supposedly ruled out by prints ..... but I still find him very intriguing.
He excelled at sports and academics in high school. He graduated from Harvard. He entered the Army (via draft). He left the army after 2 years. This is the point in the story where he should go to a major law school or medical school or business school. Instead, he went to work as a manager at a department store. And remained at that job for a while. And then he became a "business manager" for the school that his wife started.
And yet .... he married a Stanford graduate. They were prominent in the Junior Guild (which I take it is like the Junior League) in Pasadena. They owned a vacation home on the coast. And they move to a "tony" neighborhood in San Francisco, where they live down the road from the mayor and descendants of Leland Stanford.
........ um ......... see ........ I .........
Something doesn't add up here.
My personal theory of the crime - and I kind of hate it because it has high kook potential - is that Zodiac worked in intelligence/espionage. And if I were looking for a prominent secret intelligence offiicial ..... I might well look for someone with this exact sort of unusual resume.
They ruled him out by prints. And I accept that on some level. But isn't that what they would say if he were an important person in intelligence?
Like I said, I semi-hate this theory, because it ends up in conspiratorial questions like that. But intuitively, there's something about the Anthony situation that bugs me.