50Th Anniversary of BRS Newspaper Article

Zodiac Related Books, Movies,Documentaries,websites,etc

Re: 50Th Anniversary of BRS Newspaper Article

Postby sandy betts » Thu Jul 18, 2019 9:54 pm

She called me the morning she was interviewed ( That may have been the 4th? ), it was a few minutes before she gave her interview. The reason she called was to tell me that everyone was calling her for interviews. When she found out that the reporter had called me also , was when she asked me to give her the reporters phone number. That was the day of the interview and long before the article was put on the internet. I had no idea what she told the reporter, until much later, it upset me to read what she told the reporter.

Today is a different day , she called me "this morning 7-18-19" to ask me to tell everyone she is sorry. That has nothing to do with the morning of the 4th of July or the other day when Tahoe asked if she had called me yet about the newspaper article? That was when I told Tahoe I didn't think Pam would call me , because Pam knew I knew that was a lie.
And I was right, she did not call me until this morning 7-18- 19 , two weeks from the first call.

She called me on "two separate mornings 14 days apart" ,we had two different conversations on two different mornings. ( She usually calls me in the morning.)
sandy betts
 
Posts: 1278
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:14 am

Re: 50Th Anniversary of BRS Newspaper Article

Postby Quagmire » Fri Jul 19, 2019 3:36 am

I feel desperately sorry for Pam and what she has gone through. I also however feel sorry for rookie investigators to the case who have to wade through all the tall tales about Darlene being stalked by Larry Kane, Leigh Allen, Richard Gaik, Will Grant, etc. and now that Pam was also at BRS on the night of the shooting.

You have to wonder if anything at all is true over the last 50 years, whether it is stories about guys in suits at painting parties, middle aged men sitting outside her house in cars stalking her, anonymous calls to Pam by Z and so on and so forth. I’m just waiting for a story to emerge about how Donna Lass sold Darlene drugs at the painting party and was later kidnapped by drug dealers and Jim Crabtree who then posted pictures of Donna’s body to Pam but she accidentally lost them 15 years later whilst spring cleaning and they’re almost definitely in a shoe box in her brother’s attic where she keeps Paul Stine’s glasses which were left on her lawn by Rick Marshall.

Seriously - whatever next?
Quagmire
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: 50Th Anniversary of BRS Newspaper Article

Postby Tahoe27 » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:11 pm

Quagmire wrote:I feel desperately sorry for Pam and what she has gone through. I also however feel sorry for rookie investigators to the case who have to wade through all the tall tales about Darlene being stalked by Larry Kane, Leigh Allen, Richard Gaik, Will Grant, etc. and now that Pam was also at BRS on the night of the shooting.

You have to wonder if anything at all is true over the last 50 years, whether it is stories about guys in suits at painting parties, middle aged men sitting outside her house in cars stalking her, anonymous calls to Pam by Z and so on and so forth. I’m just waiting for a story to emerge about how Donna Lass sold Darlene drugs at the painting party and was later kidnapped by drug dealers and Jim Crabtree who then posted pictures of Donna’s body to Pam but she accidentally lost them 15 years later whilst spring cleaning and they’re almost definitely in a shoe box in her brother’s attic where she keeps Paul Stine’s glasses which were left on her lawn by Rick Marshall.

Seriously - whatever next?


Yes. This.
Image

"...they may be dealing with one or more ersatz Zodiacs--other psychotics eager to get into the act, or perhaps even other murderers eager to lay their crimes at the real Zodiac's doorstep." L.A. Times, 1969
User avatar
Tahoe27
 
Posts: 5279
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:13 pm

Re: 50Th Anniversary of BRS Newspaper Article

Postby sandy betts » Sun Jul 21, 2019 10:57 am

Quagmire wrote:I feel desperately sorry for Pam and what she has gone through. I also however feel sorry for rookie investigators to the case who have to wade through all the tall tales about Darlene being stalked by Larry Kane, Leigh Allen, Richard Gaik, Will Grant, etc. and now that Pam was also at BRS on the night of the shooting.

You have to wonder if anything at all is true over the last 50 years, whether it is stories about guys in suits at painting parties, middle aged men sitting outside her house in cars stalking her, anonymous calls to Pam by Z and so on and so forth. I’m just waiting for a story to emerge about how Donna Lass sold Darlene drugs at the painting party and was later kidnapped by drug dealers and Jim Crabtree who then posted pictures of Donna’s body to Pam but she accidentally lost them 15 years later whilst spring cleaning and they’re almost definitely in a shoe box in her brother’s attic where she keeps Paul Stine’s glasses which were left on her lawn by Rick Marshall.

Seriously - whatever next?


It is a shame that for what ever reason ( stroke or other reasons) she has made these comments and now everyone is wondering if anything she has said is true!
I know that the man in the suit at the party is true, because I have spoken to others who were at that party who saw the man in the suit. That party was a drug party no one did any painting. The Larry Kane stalker was a man who stalked both Pam and I at the same time, however he was" not Larry Kane" as we were told. I thought he was Kane for yrs, but when Kane died the man who we thought was Kane was still very much alive!(He only looked very much like Kane.) I asked Buzz Gordon if he was at that party, he said no that he went out with Darlene only one time and was never at her home or apt. We can probably disregard the suspects at the party and the Vallejo cops being at a drug party. The phone calls made right after Darlene was shot , I truly believe were made by Zodiac and not brother Leo, who could not make those calls, because he was arrested about the time of that shooting. Shifting through all of the statements made, to find which is true and which are not could take yrs! Maybe we should disregard all of it and just go by what the police knew to be true at that time?
sandy betts
 
Posts: 1278
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:14 am

Previous

Return to Zodiac Media

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron