by Fisherman'sFriend » Thu Oct 03, 2019 11:54 am
The idea that Z knew Stine just doesn't ring true to me. It just defies logic.
If Z knew Stine well enough to sit in the front, (which I don't believe he did) then;
1. Why would he choose this "opportunity" to commit the crime? As opposed to another one - if he knew him then why do this in the cab? Seems VERY awkward.
2. In ALL of the previous attacks Z puts physical space between himself and the victims OR he disables them (ties up Brian and Cecilia) Z NEVER engages in a physical altercation directly.
Sitting in the back is clearly more advantageous to him in this regard. Pulling a gun on someone you know in a car while sitting inches away from them... Can you imagine the risk of Stine fighting back, grabbing the gun? Too high - absolutely does not fit the previous crimes.
2. If he knew him, he would obviously be aware that the police would come looking to interview Stine's friend's, family, acquaintances etc. and would therefore be in the crosshairs to some degree.
3. Knowing that, why turn it into a "big Z" Zodiac crime with all the letters etc? In a case like that I would expect either, A= Z actually makes it look like a robbery and slips away - gets rid of a witness while making it look random, or B= Make a point of it and taunt the police - "Stine knew too much" or something cryptic... Clearly Z wouldn't miss a chance to taunt them.
4. What we actually get is a "presentation" of the killing from Zodiac through his letters that lines up just the same as the first 2 murder scenes. Which to me fits into more of a "terrorist/vigilante" kind of perspective.
Anyway, I'm not buying it.