RTF wrote:Richard Grinell wrote:Donald Fouke definitely saw and stopped Zodiac ... ... Zodiac's account is more reliable and makes more sense than any of the investigators that night ...
I have to disagree, Richard, that Fouke lied in his scratch (intra-departmental memo).
If you think about it, it makes no sense for him misrepresent what happened. He would need to guarantee that his partner, Zelms, would go along with the lie - a pointless and precarious conspiracy to engage in.
And, he would need to be 100% sure that not a single resident on Jackson peered through their curtains and witnessed him stopping and questioning Z. If such a witness later piped up to the press, Fouke's paper trail could see him wind up shovelling shinola at the SFPD dog pound.
I do understand that some folks here like to imagine that SFPD coerced Fouke into putting this lie down on paper. But this is the kind of hype that only sounds reasonable in recent decades, in light of the case appearing to be bigger than it was at the time (before Yellowbook and Tom's site elevated it).
You are correct that Fouke's recall in 2007 should be taken with a pinch of salt. That goes for many others who took part in those DVD special feature docs, and in the various documentaries in recent years.
I will ask one question therefore- why did Donald Fouke after traveling along Jackson Street head away from the crime scene towards Arguello Boulevard, rather than traveling towards a crime scene he was supposedly responding to. Why did an officer of the law supposedly responding to a taxicab driver being robbed and assaulted vacate his duties and totally ignore the attack on Paul Stine.

