by PinkPhantom » Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:32 am
Maybe. I tend to think the prints that wernt bloody aren't from Z and just everyday customers. Sure hope they checked them out anyhow though and didn't write them off entirely. man I can only imagine how many prints were all over that cab from everyday fares. It probably would only prove he was a passenger in the cab, but it would not prove he was the murderer. Unless the print is in blood.
Still wouldn't PROVE without a reasonable doubt that a bloody print was Zodiacs. The EMTs could have left it or one of the many ppl who showed up on scene after the crime. Or as some have suggested the print could have been a plant.
I doubt that print is still viable if they attempted to collect it. Maybe they were able to keep a picture of the print, but I mean jeez half of the ink prints they took back in those days are toast by now. Can't imagine the bloody prints would fare any better.
You have to remember the Zodiac isn't the only case file warehoused at SFPD. They have handled hundred of cases before and since the Zodiac. California isn't just the Zodiac Killer. There were many nasty psychopaths here in the 70's. the Zodiac wasn't the only crime that received priority, but it was one of the crimes that the press made famous in the public domain.
At any rate I don't think the prints, especially these days, would mean a lick of a difference in proving one of those many prints belonged to the killer. Too many variables at play. The cab was compromised from the start bc it was available to anyone. It wasn't a crime scene that was clean from the start with the ability to find foreign prints among organic prints from the victim and their known connections. Jmo.
Last edited by
PinkPhantom on Thu Sep 10, 2015 10:14 am, edited 1 time in total.