Zodiackillersite.com

Ratter.com has a weekly or bi weekly column dedicated to the Zodiac Mystery. You can view the articles here- http://ratter.com/tag/zodiac-porn

Here's today's, it's about the Gary Stewart Book. http://ratter.com/zodiac-porn-everyone- ... 1699565349

Do the links for 'contact this site' on Ratter only work in the USA. Every time you click them nothing happens.

UKSpycatcher wrote:Do the links for 'contact this site' on Ratter only work in the USA. Every time you click them nothing happens.

They seem to have a prominently posted email address: will@rattter.com

-glurk

EDIT: I just spent a bit of time reading all of those articles, which I had previously missed. Quick review - very good.

I agree Glurk

Cheers

Anyone see Richard Gaikowski on a bagel?

Oh wait, I found him!

Serial Grillers - The Zodiac Burger with Blue Cheese

http://www.urbanspoon.com/rph/59/1759120/1637056/tucson-serial-grillers-the-zodiac-burger-with-blue-cheese-photo

" One problem: the handwriting in the book isn’t even Earl Van Best’s, Voigt said. When Voigt first caught wind of Stewart’s book, he found the handwriting sample to be the most potentially convincing piece of evidence. Within days, though, a team of researchers on his forum, he claims, had completely debunked that piece of evidence, showing the handwriting they’d tested was from Van Best’s marriage certificate, which, it turns out, was written by the preacher who officiated the wedding.

“And he’s far too old to be the Zodiac,” Voigt says.

Voigt isn’t alone in his analysis. (Stewart could not be reached for comment.)

Mike Morford, the proprietor of zodiackillersite.com, says a team of researchers on his site detected the identical discrepancy. "

Thanks for giving me credit for my research on Van Best, Ratter. It was no "team" of researchers. Just one researcher.

Mike

I believe he reads this site and hopefully he will give appropriate credit.

I concur it was Mike_R. who did the sole investigating in order to find out who it was who actually filled out the marriage lic./certificate. We all certainly gave our opinion, but thanks to Mike_R., we were able to do so.

Yes, it was Mike R. Who deserves credit for his excellent research on the marriage license!

I also agree that it was mike_r that first found that Marriage Certificate evidence. I had forgotten about that. Then again, I have long forgotten the entire Gary Stewart book and etc., since it is so unimportant and inconsequential in the long run... Are people still taking his book seriously?

All water under the bridge at this point, at least IMHO. But credit should be assigned where due, kudos to Mike.

-glurk