Zodiackillersite.com

mike_r wrote:" One problem: the handwriting in the book isn’t even Earl Van Best’s, Voigt said. When Voigt first caught wind of Stewart’s book, he found the handwriting sample to be the most potentially convincing piece of evidence. Within days, though, a team of researchers on his forum, he claims, had completely debunked that piece of evidence, showing the handwriting they’d tested was from Van Best’s marriage certificate, which, it turns out, was written by the preacher who officiated the wedding.

“And he’s far too old to be the Zodiac,” Voigt says.

Voigt isn’t alone in his analysis. (Stewart could not be reached for comment.)

Mike Morford, the proprietor of zodiackillersite.com, says a team of researchers on his site detected the identical discrepancy. "

Thanks for giving me credit for my research on Van Best, Ratter. It was no "team" of researchers. Just one researcher.

Mike

mike_r wrote:It is conceivable that if it were not for my efforts, Gary Stewart would be being heralded as the man who solved the case. That handwriting was compelling. Many would have considered the case closed unless someone else at some point thought of looking at the priest's handwriting. So it is far from "water under the bridge, LOL."

As the old saying goes, there is no "T-E-A-M" in the word "I"!

Mike

Tahoe27 wrote:I think Mike_R's getting a hold of that lady at the church(?) and getting the additional handwriting out of those logs was sure an added bonus!

morf13 wrote:Tomorrow's (Thursday 5/7/15)Ratter.com Zodiac article will center on Ross Sullivan! Without giving too much away and stealing Ratter's Thunder, they did a great job and made some headway we were not able to make thus far, and found out some possibly important details.