Page 4 of 8

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2018 3:31 pm
by Zamantha
Found Doug Oswell’s Post. re: The Motarboard Hood.



By Douglas Oswell (Dowland) (12.90.16.156) on Thursday, September 20, 2001 - 10:27 pm:
Scott, we need to ask ourselves whether that hood signified anything special to Zodiac. I've argued the point that it would have been very easy to fashion the hood from a graduate's black gown and mortarboard. That would have symbolized something to Kaczynski, who, several months earlier, had abandoned the career (academia) for which he and his parents had dedicated his entire life up to that point.


On Tom V’s old forum, posted 2001.
http://www.zodiackiller.com/mba/csabh/262.html

Zam*

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2018 3:43 pm
by Zamantha
Motarboard post, 5/14/2001 in Tom V forum:


By Douglas Oswell (Dowland) (73.philadelphia01rh.15.pa.dial-access.att.net - 12.90.16.73) on Monday, May 14, 2001 - 08:57 pm:
I suspect a graduation hat(those 'square corners') was used as a base and the black cloth sewn on ;so that would bring up height.

http://www.zodiackiller.com/mba/csabh/360.html

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:22 pm
by TomVoigt
So Hewitt's either a thief, or did a piss-poor job of researching the idea of Kaczynski being the Zodiac.

Seriously, if you Google "zodiac kaczynski" it's impossible to miss unazod.com and Doug Oswell's research. Are we to believe Hewitt didn't bother to read any of it? That's quite the stretch. Plus they were both members of my discussion forum -- at the same time, mind you.

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:39 pm
by THE LOVER
There is just no way TK could go up to someone and stab them.

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:50 pm
by THE LOVER
I find it hard to believe someone who had as much trouble living around people. And soon wouldn’t could be Zodiac. Had someone bring up the British ties which long have been apart of Zodiac. TK have British ties?

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:55 pm
by THE LOVER
Mageau, is such a dead end on description for me. I don’t take anything he said as reality. Couldn’t have gotten a good look. And when he recounted it years latter his mind couldn’t be good due to substance abuse. Will never know if John’s was picked up by Zodiac. But I doubt it. And if it was, than that’s bad for TK being Zodiac. TK couldn’t talk to women, so I doubt TK was up for picking them up to abduct them.

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 6:05 pm
by Richard Grinell
How was Ted Kaczynski writing the July 31st letters and mailing them from San Francisco, attacking Michael Mageau and Darlene Ferrin at BRS on July 4th, and committing attacks in September and October, as well as writing numerous letters mailed from San Francisco in 1970, when Ted Kaczynski and his brother were in Canada

"The moment that crystallised this yawning gulf between them came, paradoxically, at a time when the brothers had never felt more close. It was 1969 and they had spent the whole summer together, travelling huge distances across Canada in search of a plot of land where Ted could begin his anti-civilisation mission. At the end of the trip, as they were driving back to Chicago, they camped overnight in the grasslands of Nebraska."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/ ... -unabomber

"Kaczynski taught at Berkeley from September 1967 until June 1969, and then quit. It was the end of his academic career. He spent the next two years looking for land in Canada, Alaska, and finally Montana. There, he bought 1.5 acres about 4 miles (6.4 kilometers) outside the small town of Lincoln, Montana. With a little help from his brother David, Kaczynski built a one-room cabin measuring about 10 feet by 12 feet (about 2 meters by 3 meters). The cabin had no electricity, no telephone, and no indoor plumbing. He got drinking water from a nearby creek. It was to be his home for the next sixteen years."

https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/ency ... -unabomber

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:27 pm
by THE LOVER
I’m certain TK could pull it off. Busy boy.

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:54 pm
by Jelberg
Richard Grinell wrote:How was Ted Kaczynski writing the July 31st letters and mailing them from San Francisco, attacking Michael Mageau and Darlene Ferrin at BRS on July 4th, and committing attacks in September and October, as well as writing numerous letters mailed from San Francisco in 1970, when Ted Kaczynski and his brother were in Canada

"The moment that crystallised this yawning gulf between them came, paradoxically, at a time when the brothers had never felt more close. It was 1969 and they had spent the whole summer together, travelling huge distances across Canada in search of a plot of land where Ted could begin his anti-civilisation mission. At the end of the trip, as they were driving back to Chicago, they camped overnight in the grasslands of Nebraska."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/ ... -unabomber

"Kaczynski taught at Berkeley from September 1967 until June 1969, and then quit. It was the end of his academic career. He spent the next two years looking for land in Canada, Alaska, and finally Montana. There, he bought 1.5 acres about 4 miles (6.4 kilometers) outside the small town of Lincoln, Montana. With a little help from his brother David, Kaczynski built a one-room cabin measuring about 10 feet by 12 feet (about 2 meters by 3 meters). The cabin had no electricity, no telephone, and no indoor plumbing. He got drinking water from a nearby creek. It was to be his home for the next sixteen years."

https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/ency ... -unabomber


There is a section of Hewitt's book that addresses this whole argument...
ch16.7

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2018 8:28 pm
by THE LOVER
The problem with naming a suspect with so many holes in theory is when you have to create reasons for why the suspect works.