Article on Mark Hewitt’s latest Book.
https://www.timesheraldonline.com/2018/ ... ssion=true
Claypooles wrote:I'm still amazed that so many people seem to consider Kaczynski as not being a convincing suspect in the Zodiac case, while offering the goofiest names as the answer to who was the Z
Claypooles wrote:... I don't think the common serial killer rules apply to Kazcynski.
morf13 wrote:Different signatures & MO's = different killers
Claypooles wrote:...killers can change their MO and signature....
....I don't think the common serial killer rules apply to Kazcynski....
Claypooles wrote:I guess people go the easy way, then. I don't see it like this all, complete opposite actually! TK was angry at the world and more precisely at young people, because he wanted to be them but knew he was different, had always been treated as an outcast. At one point he made the extra step and started killing young people as a revenge, and then, once he had passed his "message" through newspapers and started to exist in the eyes of everyone, he went away from society (no more murders, just letters / starting living in a secluded cabin in the woods of Montana). But that desire of revenge through killing was still there, and he responded to it using his new hobbie, that is bombs. It's all there in the Zodiac letters!
And to me, killers can change their MO and signature. As I just said, Zodiac clearly turned to bombs after guns, and in between he had used a knike. Like he wrote himself: By gun, by fire, by rope, by knife. I am totally convinced that passing from Zodiac to Unabomber was a logical path. Both were unique killers, I don't think the common serial killer rules apply to Kazcynski.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest