by morf13 » Tue May 13, 2014 5:55 pm
Here's my problem, I think his suspect is interesting. I think it's also interesting that the Girl who he kidnapped/married, had Grandparents living in Vallejo in 1969. I think the fact his Father/Suspect, assuming he really enjoyed the Mikado is interesting. Ther'e alot of interesting stuff.
What I can't even accept, or force myself to read(listen to since its an audio book),is the part in which the author, out of left field, suddenly just starts saying that "Van shot Darlene","Van mailed a letter to the editor". No warning, no bother to make a connection or show how he came to be zodiac, or if he knew the victims. None of that. This is no short book, and I can't bring myself to go thru 5 more hours of bullshit in which this guy decides, with no proof, to declare his Father was zodiac.
If his Suspect turns out to be zodiac, it apparently will be thur dumb luck, because in my opinion, the Author has shown no verifiable evidence or connections.
Luckily, it looks like several people her will have the book soon, so reports should be plenty. I have a feeling, they will mostly be negative.
I hope everybody here understands