Unigram distance curiosity

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Largo » Thu Dec 14, 2017 3:38 am

Hi Jarlve,
The good news first: I just checked the cipher again and it doesn't contain any bugs. Thus it can be solved
The less good news: As you said, I actually chose a key with more symbols than z340. I didn't pay attention here, I am sorry :(. I hope that's not the reason why it hasn't been solved.

Here is the distribution of the keys:

Largo_Sing_Along_Key_Distribution.png


Orange: Key A
White: Key B

Here are the keys (scroll all the way down, I didn't want to spoil)

Code: Select all
































Key A (Orange):
GVtoh1dDiZTW94b+C5mj:zKMLw8sNruUkBHax3ye0PfgI;Aq7RX=YOnvSQl-EJF2pc
AAAABBCCDDDEEEEEEEEEFGGHHHIIIIJKLLLMNNNNOOPQRRRRSSSSSTTTTTUUUVWXYZ

Key B (White):
GVtoh1dDiZTW94b+C5mj:zKMLw8sNruUkBHax3ye0PfgI;Aq7RX=YOnvSQl-EJF2pc
ZYXWVUUUTTTTTSSSSSRRRRQPOONNNNMLLLKJIIIIHHHGGFEEEEEEEEEDDDCCBBAAAA



Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Largo
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 4:38 am
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Jarlve » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:41 am

Thank you Largo, do not worry about it.

Not unoften lyrics tend to be hard to solve plaintexts and this one is no exception. AZdecrypt has a very hard time solving the orange part, which are 12 rows @ about 0.3 multiplicity. I actually had to resort to merging the cycles to solve it. My hill climber would never have gotten it.

Could you make me another one with a non-lyric plaintext, no more than 2 cuts per key, 63 symbols and ioc similar to the 340?
User avatar
Jarlve
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Largo » Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:46 am

Jarlve wrote:Could you make me another one with a non-lyric plaintext, no more than 2 cuts per key, 63 symbols and ioc similar to the 340?


Sure! I can't promise a new cipher today but I think I can create one tomorrow. But I don't know how to make sure the ioc fits. I am not that familiar with this topic.
Largo
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 4:38 am
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Jarlve » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:30 am

Largo wrote:
Jarlve wrote:Could you make me another one with a non-lyric plaintext, no more than 2 cuts per key, 63 symbols and ioc similar to the 340?


Sure! I can't promise a new cipher today but I think I can create one tomorrow. But I don't know how to make sure the ioc fits. I am not that familiar with this topic.

Will make a cipher myself.
User avatar
Jarlve
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Jarlve » Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:41 am

Jarlve wrote:
Largo wrote:
Jarlve wrote:Could you make me another one with a non-lyric plaintext, no more than 2 cuts per key, 63 symbols and ioc similar to the 340?


Sure! I can't promise a new cipher today but I think I can create one tomorrow. But I don't know how to make sure the ioc fits. I am not that familiar with this topic.

Will make a cipher myself.

Code: Select all
1  2  3  4  5  4  1  6  7  3  8  9  10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 5  1  22 3  23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 20 8  1  31 3  32 33 34 35 11 36 27 8  37 38
39 8  4  1  40 2  3  8  41 42 1  6  43 9  44 45 15
3  8  46 47 17 48 49 35 35 5  21 50 51 11 52 53 20
33 43 14 54 12 55 56 57 1  14 58 55 40 49 42 8  13
51 10 13 40 31 1  26 18 49 49 51 55 59 5  42 49 15
1  22 20 60 51 34 19 29 42 12 28 1  24 56 52 10 49
42 4  27 6  32 18 61 51 19 62 11 60 19 37 14 34 1
41 51 57 40 21 29 1  19 44 11 50 5  49 42 63 47 19
1  2  51 4  15 1  8  6  51 9  63 13 12 37 16 51 8
6  18 33 39 19 44 21 23 54 20 22 26 29 27 30 46 35
5  63 13 14 38 56 47 42 8  13 1  41 51 24 6  43 40
7  63 44 30 10 8  18 24 6  13 12 63 25 13 1  33 5
55 56 51 10 50 18 49 42 36 1  9  51 45 44 23 58 5
23 15 26 19 8  1  24 56 29 17 33 54 32 58 43 39 8
41 5  35 12 27 21 44 8  3  45 53 7  25 30 19 6  7
57 34 4  1  14 40 23 49 26 15 22 38 3  8  62 63 1
55 17 24 45 5  31 47 11 26 54 32 37 46 29 35 3  2
6  1  8  9  15 60 61 17 35 5  8  18 11 3  50 3  21
User avatar
Jarlve
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Largo » Thu Dec 14, 2017 3:20 pm

Hey Jarlve,

I've created a new cipher for you. It corresponds to your wishes, but I couldn't manage to match the z340's IOC. I hope it's useful for you, though.

Code: Select all
q9GvHXe0Yw1RZy5P0
7-fmxSQaO3d1BVElL
Pnvs4euZeUejSX0fP
5kIzWKfxYQeMDlbJF
vcTS2zDGY0WtVKjoM
zP9w4hO1N+bT7L3pW
G-LVQtUorchkfulUR
qNgc28Bp7Q5snvwlI
RbA1JX39Sr2Fx50uI
PxGYpA4fgD8VTO7Kk
Nu-3q0fvUo9L1SrHO
PLLkAansZXYVe0O8x
iE3hQN4JjrPebIu71
mlzRWKdAUMFkDq9Gv
sWwJ5vC9SxEX3qBQR
7jItLRNAHrlou+24h
XFp7YGQ051OnPJtTf
FxIoMgl8VUAhqC51L
wcRksYI7-zBAvSa0W
2E9NpRjtKMor+5HL3
Largo
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 4:38 am
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Largo » Thu Dec 14, 2017 3:31 pm

Largo wrote:But I don't know how to make sure the ioc fits. I am not that familiar with this topic.


Of course I know what the IOC is. But I don't know how to create a cipher that matches a specific IOC.
Largo
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 4:38 am
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Jarlve » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:11 am

Largo wrote:Hey Jarlve,

I've created a new cipher for you. It corresponds to your wishes, but I couldn't manage to match the z340's IOC. I hope it's useful for you, though.

Code: Select all
q9GvHXe0Yw1RZy5P0
7-fmxSQaO3d1BVElL
Pnvs4euZeUejSX0fP
5kIzWKfxYQeMDlbJF
vcTS2zDGY0WtVKjoM
zP9w4hO1N+bT7L3pW
G-LVQtUorchkfulUR
qNgc28Bp7Q5snvwlI
RbA1JX39Sr2Fx50uI
PxGYpA4fgD8VTO7Kk
Nu-3q0fvUo9L1SrHO
PLLkAansZXYVe0O8x
iE3hQN4JjrPebIu71
mlzRWKdAUMFkDq9Gv
sWwJ5vC9SxEX3qBQR
7jItLRNAHrlou+24h
XFp7YGQ051OnPJtTf
FxIoMgl8VUAhqC51L
wcRksYI7-zBAvSa0W
2E9NpRjtKMor+5HL3


Thank you Largo. It ran overnight and solved. This is a proof of concept for me.

Code: Select all
Score: 17928.81 Ioc: 0.06040
Ngrams: 313 PC-cycles: 532

Raised rows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14

FUNDITSIMPLYASFAI
LINGGAYANDALLYOUP
ANDDISEASESTATINA
FEWYOUNGMYSTRUSTH
ECRETLYASERIALKIL
LERARISINGFROMATR
AUMATICINCIDENTCO
NNECTEDTOTHEDEATH
OFHISPARENTSWHENH
EWASTHREEYEARSOLD
BEIDFINDEDUPLAYIN
APPERANDATMYSINGG
OODBYBITTYASSWELL
GUYYOUARETHERFUND
ERASHEGREWUPANDTO
OKHIMONHUNTINGTRI
PSTOSATEHISDESIRE
SWHILETEACHINGHIM
ACODESHOULDHEEVER
TURNTOKILLINGHUMA
User avatar
Jarlve
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Largo » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:31 am

Wow, that's really cool! Congratulations!
If I may ask: The rows 5-10 and 15-20 are solved correctly, but what about rows 1-4 and 11-14? Is it possible to solve these too? This part of the cipher is a little bit smaller and therefore more difficult to solve, isn't it?
Largo
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 4:38 am
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: Unigram distance curiosity

Postby Jarlve » Fri Dec 15, 2017 3:52 am

Largo wrote:Wow, that's really cool! Congratulations!
If I may ask: The rows 5-10 and 15-20 are solved correctly, but what about rows 1-4 and 11-14? Is it possible to solve these too? This part of the cipher is a little bit smaller and therefore more difficult to solve, isn't it?

Yes. Either the solver did not run long enough or the smaller subsection has gone lost in high multiplicity.
User avatar
Jarlve
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Belgium

Previous

Return to Zodiac Cipher Mailings & Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Shawn, versaceversace and 30 guests

cron