would you agree ?

would you agree ?

Postby ace ventura » Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:51 pm

Would you agree that if a code was found that turns the 340 cipher into complete sentences and reads in zodiacs style of the 408 ,threats ,taunts etc.
And does the same for the 18,32,13 and celeb cipher we would have the real cipher code key at last
User avatar
ace ventura
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:23 am

Re: would you agree ?

Postby Mr lowe » Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm

The simple answer is yes . Of course it will be dissected by the experts but that's what is needed..
What you talkin bout ace
Mr lowe
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 4:07 am

Re: would you agree ?

Postby doranchak » Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:33 pm

It also depends on how "creative" the decoding process is.

Take Corey Starliper's solution, for instance. He basically just wrote the sentences he wanted to see then tried to make it seem like there was some sort of encoding system that generated the sentences.

But no, the "encoding system" was his own imagination.
User avatar
doranchak
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:26 am

Re: would you agree ?

Postby Quicktrader » Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:10 am

I would disagree :twisted: as there are about six different symbols in the shorter ciphers which are not present in the 340 at all. This would somehow means that at least six letters had not been used in the 340 or that Z had used extra homophones in his shorter ciphers (although e.g. 1-7 homophones are available in the 340). And that is quite unlikely the case (why should he've done so..more likely that he had used a completely different code for each cipher). Neverthless..the trig FBI also does appear in the 340, so those two ciphers could actually have used the same code.

QT
*ZODIACHRONOLOGY*
User avatar
Quicktrader
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:23 am
Location: Vienna, Austria (Europe)

Re: would you agree ?

Postby ace ventura » Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:57 am

Quicktrader wrote:I would disagree :twisted: as there are about six different symbols in the shorter ciphers which are not present in the 340 at all. This would somehow means that at least six letters had not been used in the 340 or that Z had used extra homophones in his shorter ciphers (although e.g. 1-7 homophones are available in the 340). And that is quite unlikely the case (why should he've done so..more likely that he had used a completely different code for each cipher). Neverthless..the trig FBI also does appear in the 340, so those two ciphers could actually have used the same code.

QT

Sooo ... you can blindly figure out words and thus sentences or try to here ( with various math formula s ...but if you had sentences only missing a letter here and there that would blank you ?

I not sure how any one here is still breathing we were to be dead by the Ebola post in 2015
User avatar
ace ventura
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:23 am

Re: would you agree ?

Postby duckking2001 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:56 pm

No also. I don't think the celebrity cipher is Z.

I assume that you have some such key? I don't know why you would think that he would've used the same key for all those ciphers, otherwise. I understand, many people think that Z32 and Z13 were clues to the Z340, but that is the reason why I doubt it. Without the solution to those ciphers they actually make it harder to solve the 340, not easier.
User avatar
duckking2001
 
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:28 am

Re: would you agree ?

Postby Marclean » Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:30 pm

I think, just think, not sure or arguments, that the ZKMF made your code hinting in letters (posting dates, stamps etc) and maybe other codes.
Otherwise, if he made 340, then "coded" random and chaotic way, we are all dead before the solution.
However, I believe that there are many approaches and one of them will arrive to break it.
The sad thing is, is right, this damn or is already dead or too old for ultimate justice of men. :x

Marcelo :)
http://zodiacode1933.blogspot.com.br/
"Ergueu no patamar quatro paredes mágicas , tijolo com tijolo num desenho lógico"
Chico Buarque de Hollanda
User avatar
Marclean
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: would you agree ?

Postby Deplorable at Best » Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 pm

@Ace Bring it on, muh brotha. I'd love to see it!
Deplorable at Best
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:33 pm

Re: would you agree ?

Postby ace ventura » Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:08 pm

Deplorable at Best wrote:@Ace Bring it on, muh brotha. I'd love to see it!

No plans to post here. Working on Copywrite now
User avatar
ace ventura
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:23 am

Re: would you agree ?

Postby duckking2001 » Wed Jan 27, 2016 2:10 am

Shouldn't the Zodiac be the one getting the copyright then? If it's right, then it's his solution.

I wouldn't agree that a solution that is not subject to peer review is likely to be correct.
User avatar
duckking2001
 
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:28 am

Next

Return to Zodiac Cipher Mailings & Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: doranchak, epiphone, Goodkidmaadtoschi, tGkTcy2W9B4p60o and 42 guests

cron