Re: 11/29/66 The "Confession" letter
Norse wrote:It happens all the time - and it happened back then too.
It does and it did. It would have also been on the radar back then as well. The suspicion that something might be a fake or a crackpot played a part and I think we should remember that the 'stuff' we have as evidence, whilst not ironclad, is surely the end product, to a certain degree, of vetting processes. Whilst it's certainly possible that the confession letter and Bates letters were by an unknown party inserting themselves into a case there are certain 'extra' factors that make these things a bit more than possible 'fakes' for want of a better description.
The backward compatibility in these letters from the Z-campaign make these, imho, more than possible crackpot letters. Unless of course we think that Z somehow noticed this crime and took certain otherwise obscure minutia from it's details and incorporated them into his own communications before he also got really lucky when someone else noticed these things and brought them to world's attention or did Z just get lucky with the little things incorporating them into his own campaign purely by chance and then was handed a gift wrapped crime in terms of the communications laced with these little similarities and all he had to do was claim it?
I guess this is where 'No Zodiac' theories are born. Just unrelated crimes linked by a time travelling letter writer lol.