My name is cipher
A few thoughts regarding the my-name-is cipher: Assuming the 7/19/78 letter is authentic and Z CJB's murderer..according to the mentioned letter, Z's first name could be 'Paul' (my name is on the bottom lid of a scotch tape..
http://www.zodiackillersite.com/viewtop ... f=69&t=726
viewtopic.php?f=97&t=727&hilit=bottom+lid
If those assumptions are correct, some circumstances should be considered:
1. Out of approximately 30,000 names (from different yearbooks, e.g. Ramona, Lompoc etc.), not even one single name matches the my-name-is cipher structure.
2. Most likely, the first four symbols of the cipher would represent the letters 'P', 'A', 'U', and 'L'.
3. Assuming each symbol representing one alphabetical letter, the second but last letter of the cipher cleartext would be a 'P'. Same with the third but last letter of the cipher, it'd represent a 'U'. This is valid for both, simple substitution as well as homophone substitution cipher types.
A cipher cracking line could therefore look somehow like this:
P A U L _ _ _ _ _ _ U P _
It should be considered further that on position 5, 7, 9 the cipher symbol is the same. Furthermore, the symbols on position 8 and 12 are equal, too. The cipher structure would therefore look somehow like this:
P A U L ? _ ? # ? _ U P #
One might replace the repeating symbols with letters to get a list of potential partial solutions, e.g. 'E' and 'M':
P A U L E _ E M E _ U P M
..
As you can see, such a partial solution is not very likely as there do not exist many names ending with '-UPM'.
Such a list of cleartext structures is in fact not very long. Let it consist of no more than 676 values (26x26). It then is possible to preselect each value according to it's likeliness to represent a complete name.
When doing so, one must realize that most of the cleartext combinations are very unlikely to represent a name. Instead, only a few ones have some potential, such as:
P A U L H _ H A H _ U P A
which could be interpreted as a 'Paul H. Chahlupa'.
Frequent last names, such as Miller or Robertson etc. do not occur at all.
In fact, the chance to complete the 'name from the bottom lid of a scotch tape' in a 'normal' way, is quite low. This again is not a surprise as we are already aware that out of approximately 30,000 names not even one could be matched to the cipher structure. At least unless someone doesn'T shuffle everything creating his 'own' cleartext (e.g. anagram & substitution..).
Although not checked-out yet, other first names lead to similar difficulties (the 300 most frequent first names represent approximately 78% of the population). What caught my eye, however, was the following cleartext structure:
P A U L S _ S Y S _ U P Y
On the first look, when trying to place a last name, the structure doesn't make a lot of sense. On a second look, however, it could make sense:
P A U L S U S Y S N U P Y
A combination of three names, e.g. 'Paul, Susy and Snupy'. Or 'Paul, Susy, Stupy' with 'Stupy' for example being the last name of a Paul and a Susy is a possible solution.
Of course this is a 'wild' theory somehow, however it represents the only logical conclusion according to the 7/19/78 letter.
So far, I have not found any other name matching the my-name-is-cipher.
In addition to that, the last name 'Stupy' is indeed present in the LA region. And, although I still believe that Z had mostly been acting alone, there do exist at least some hints that Z had a partner in crime (two persons being seen by witnesses at the CJB's crime scene, searching the watch with their flashlights).
QT
http://www.zodiackillersite.com/viewtop ... f=69&t=726
viewtopic.php?f=97&t=727&hilit=bottom+lid
If those assumptions are correct, some circumstances should be considered:
1. Out of approximately 30,000 names (from different yearbooks, e.g. Ramona, Lompoc etc.), not even one single name matches the my-name-is cipher structure.
2. Most likely, the first four symbols of the cipher would represent the letters 'P', 'A', 'U', and 'L'.
3. Assuming each symbol representing one alphabetical letter, the second but last letter of the cipher cleartext would be a 'P'. Same with the third but last letter of the cipher, it'd represent a 'U'. This is valid for both, simple substitution as well as homophone substitution cipher types.
A cipher cracking line could therefore look somehow like this:
P A U L _ _ _ _ _ _ U P _
It should be considered further that on position 5, 7, 9 the cipher symbol is the same. Furthermore, the symbols on position 8 and 12 are equal, too. The cipher structure would therefore look somehow like this:
P A U L ? _ ? # ? _ U P #
One might replace the repeating symbols with letters to get a list of potential partial solutions, e.g. 'E' and 'M':
P A U L E _ E M E _ U P M
..
As you can see, such a partial solution is not very likely as there do not exist many names ending with '-UPM'.
Such a list of cleartext structures is in fact not very long. Let it consist of no more than 676 values (26x26). It then is possible to preselect each value according to it's likeliness to represent a complete name.
When doing so, one must realize that most of the cleartext combinations are very unlikely to represent a name. Instead, only a few ones have some potential, such as:
P A U L H _ H A H _ U P A
which could be interpreted as a 'Paul H. Chahlupa'.
Frequent last names, such as Miller or Robertson etc. do not occur at all.
In fact, the chance to complete the 'name from the bottom lid of a scotch tape' in a 'normal' way, is quite low. This again is not a surprise as we are already aware that out of approximately 30,000 names not even one could be matched to the cipher structure. At least unless someone doesn'T shuffle everything creating his 'own' cleartext (e.g. anagram & substitution..).
Although not checked-out yet, other first names lead to similar difficulties (the 300 most frequent first names represent approximately 78% of the population). What caught my eye, however, was the following cleartext structure:
P A U L S _ S Y S _ U P Y
On the first look, when trying to place a last name, the structure doesn't make a lot of sense. On a second look, however, it could make sense:
P A U L S U S Y S N U P Y
A combination of three names, e.g. 'Paul, Susy and Snupy'. Or 'Paul, Susy, Stupy' with 'Stupy' for example being the last name of a Paul and a Susy is a possible solution.
Of course this is a 'wild' theory somehow, however it represents the only logical conclusion according to the 7/19/78 letter.
So far, I have not found any other name matching the my-name-is-cipher.
In addition to that, the last name 'Stupy' is indeed present in the LA region. And, although I still believe that Z had mostly been acting alone, there do exist at least some hints that Z had a partner in crime (two persons being seen by witnesses at the CJB's crime scene, searching the watch with their flashlights).
QT