Re: X=Z? Pros and Cons
Hi-
This is some very interesting stuff. I have considered the code being in Norwegian. I had a Norwegian cryptographer look at it but he didn't come up with anything. Maybe I have to give him the "sla" clue. I had never looked at the "sla" letter in that way but that is what fresh eyes on the case can do!
Interesting observations about the DNA. I've been trying to convey that it is a red herring for a long time but nobody seems to listen. The infallibility of DNA is very deeply ingrained in peoples' minds; they can't get past the belief that because the Zodiac case took place in the 1960s, it was impossible for him to avoid licking stamps and envelopes, etc. SFPD even said that their sample "may not be reliable" in 2009. It is a combined sample and even more than that, KQ would have known of saliva testing in the 1960s.
Mike
This is some very interesting stuff. I have considered the code being in Norwegian. I had a Norwegian cryptographer look at it but he didn't come up with anything. Maybe I have to give him the "sla" clue. I had never looked at the "sla" letter in that way but that is what fresh eyes on the case can do!
Interesting observations about the DNA. I've been trying to convey that it is a red herring for a long time but nobody seems to listen. The infallibility of DNA is very deeply ingrained in peoples' minds; they can't get past the belief that because the Zodiac case took place in the 1960s, it was impossible for him to avoid licking stamps and envelopes, etc. SFPD even said that their sample "may not be reliable" in 2009. It is a combined sample and even more than that, KQ would have known of saliva testing in the 1960s.
Mike
