Craigfitzer wrote:Being someone fairly new to this case I have looked up all the major suspects. I honestly haven't seen anything written that can show me why it can't be Lawrence Kane. To me looking at all of these suspects freshly, this seems to be the clear Suspect. Outside of the possibility the Riverside activity he seems to be the obvious Candidate for the Zodiac. But I am new to this, can someone answer the question of "Why not Kane?"
Thank so Much
AK Wilks wrote:Kane looks nothing like the SF Zodiac sketch. Descriptions differ and weight is hard to guess and it is easy to look heavier. But both Mageau and Johns said Z was 160 pounds and 25 to 30 years old. There is nothing at all to indicate that Kane had a strong interest in or knowledge of either code making or bomb designing. Or opera or Norse. A radioman in the Navy sends coded messages from a book. He does not make and create new codes. And the handwriting is not a match.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest