Simplicity wrote:
I truly respect what you have said and even curiouscat. Let me be clear whilst i make a broad statement here i know the reality of the matter is that he is highly unlikely that he is the zodiac.
My stance is this, this was a bad man once apon a time. There are things we all can not see and what may or may not eventuate is not to be known.
After looking through his files and based on the over-all gist of his writings, plus the things I found that I posted here, in my mind the basics for suspecting him in the Zodiac or potentially other crimes has been established. He was in the areas, he even mentions specific towns, Tracy, Vallejo, Benecia and San Francisco, he was in Southern California when earlier suspected cases occurred. He had serious mental issues, he had serious issues with women, with government, with the media. He owned firearms. There are other things but you get the idea.
However, it now requires a higher level of evidence. Does he have a police record, was he a stalker, was he fired from his teaching jobs because of problems with women, as I suspect. Is there any way to establish where he was the nights the attacks occurred. This would require someone with the ability to access records, speak to people who knew him, worked with him, etc. That most likely will require someone with some authority who can access government records and people would be more willing to talk to, and that ain't us. Hopefully this Vallejo detective will give him an honest going over.