Harvey F. Colliver

[Simplicity]

purchased 1964 plymouth january 3 1964 owned until unknown time. possibly with white wall tires.

Any info on the model and color?

no such info, but the date of purchase might narrow things down. it was purchased in richmond cali, that's all i know.

[Simplicity]

Also found his 1971 address is seems dated june 4 1971.

1518 east 14th street, #2 oakland 94606.

There is another address prior to this one which is in San Fran itself which i hope to find again.

[Simplicity]

Regarding there being no zodiac like symbols in his documents:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/nhkzf5f5wi18 ... YIara?dl=0

Yes, they aren't all perfect but there is a constant theme, the documents are titled 1965, but have dates raging from 67 - 69.

This is on top of the actual Zodiac symbols found on his film reels.


Also in that file is a peculiar letter at the very end which i would greatly appreciate others input.

[Simplicity]

I've found a detective in Vallejo who is willing to work with me on this.

I know what i see, at the very least this can highlight a family members for a DNA test and hopefully provide a swift ending either way.

I can not expect anyone to digest these documents like relentless or even myself has in such little time.

[CuriousCat]

I can not expect anyone to digest these documents like relentless or even myself has in such little time.

What you can't expect, is for anyone to digest these documents in the way you have. Don't expect others to look at it and say you are correct about everything.

[Quicktrader]

I think it is NOT a good idea to involve officials without having at least some sort of consent in the group. Some of us are involved in this or comparable cases since years and as long as there is no common agree upon (FACTS FACTS FACTS), officials should not be involved (otherwise our 'work' will not be accepted in the future).

QT

[Simplicity]

I can not expect anyone to digest these documents like relentless or even myself has in such little time.

What you can't expect, is for anyone to digest these documents in the way you have. Don't expect others to look at it and say you are correct about everything.

Fact #1 blatantly labeled a murder, i don't care if he is the zodiac or not.
Fact #2 no one has actually asked for relentlessz own perspectives in any correct or proper manner, badgering what is basically the only surviving person who knew the man.
Fact #3 proximity
Fact #4 crazy eccentric that you yourself could hardly stomach.

[CuriousCat]

I can not expect anyone to digest these documents like relentless or even myself has in such little time.

What you can't expect, is for anyone to digest these documents in the way you have. Don't expect others to look at it and say you are correct about everything.

Fact #1 blatantly labeled a murder, i don't care if he is the zodiac or not.
Fact #2 no one has actually asked for relentlessz own perspectives in any correct or proper manner, badgering what is basically the only surviving person who knew the man.
Fact #3 proximity
Fact #4 crazy eccentric that you yourself could hardly stomach.

I'm just saying don't expect everyone to agree with you that he is the Zodiac. I've said the guy is worthy of suspicion.

[CuriousCat]

I think it is NOT a good idea to involve officials without having at least some sort of consent in the group. Some of us are involved in this or comparable cases since years and as long as there is no common agree upon (FACTS FACTS FACTS), officials should not be involved (otherwise our 'work' will not be accepted in the future).

QT

I see nothing wrong if he has found a Vallejo detective to look at it. That's what is needed. They can check this guy's record out much better than we can.

[Simplicity]

I think it is NOT a good idea to involve officials without having at least some sort of consent in the group. Some of us are involved in this or comparable cases since years and as long as there is no common agree upon (FACTS FACTS FACTS), officials should not be involved (otherwise our 'work' will not be accepted in the future).

QT

I truly respect what you have said and even curiouscat. Let me be clear whilst i make a broad statement here i know the reality of the matter is that he is highly unlikely that he is the zodiac.

My stance is this, this was a bad man once apon a time. There are things we all can not see and what may or may not eventuate is not to be known.