TomVoigt wrote:Paul Stine's sister, Carol, is on record having stated that Inspector Armstrong of SFPD told her Zodiac rode in front.
Aside from that, there is no evidence Zodiac ever rode in the back, it's an assumption perpetuated by books and movies. Zodiac was never seen in the back of the cab, nothing about the crime was necessary for the Zodiac to be in the back, and according to Carol, who would have no reason to lie, the investigation proved Zodiac rode in front.
It's hard to imagine that the police wouldn't have made a determination on which seat he was sitting in.
It's also reasonable to think they might have discussed that sort of detail with Carol.
Further I believe Carol has stated that she had fixed this piece of information in her mind as she was adamant that Paul only allowed friends to ride up front.
Having said that I think a lot of people have a strong reluctance to believe information that has passed by memory from Armstrong to Carol to Tom.
And it's not because anyone thinks they would lie.
The reason people are doubtful has more to do with observations most of us have made about the reliability of peoples memories.
If you've ever sat around the table at a family gathering and discussed old memories you may have observed the phenomenon of faulty memory.
At my own family gatherings my aunts and uncles argue incessantly over details from the past. Simple details that should stick in ones mind. The most basic detail cannot be established with any certainty, they can't seem to decide if the Holiday they took in in 2004 was to the local beach, or Bangkok, even if they've never set foot in Bangkok. And then each in term will cite reasons that this detail is etched in their memory. It usually goes something like this,
"it was definitely Bangkok, I know because I spent four weeks in the lead up learning Thai"
"NO. I know for a fact that it was the local beach, because I took surfing lessons!"
"Well then explain how it is I can speak Thai?!"
"Explain how it is I can surf!!"
... And so it goes back and forth.
Having said that not everyone is so unreliable and I still tend to believe that if Carol was indeed told by Armstrong that Zodiac sat in the front seat, it is likely that she would remember the detail correctly. So in short, I believe it, with the usual grain of salt that aught to accompany hearsay.
No reason to be too quick to believe, but no reason to be unreasonably skeptical.