Stine crime scene witnesses

morf13, Subject: Stine crime scene witnesses Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:29 am
Was skimming thru the FBI fiels and found that one of the Stine witnesses(the 8 year old), identified a potentail suspect. The name is redacted, but the person lived in San Francisco. Anybody know who the kid may have possibly identified?

Quicktrader, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:24 am
Maybe the kid was shown a Z sketch?

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:03 pm
Quicktrader wrote:Maybe the kid was shown a Z sketch?
No, the Kid was one of the witnesses that helped an artist make the sketch. He must have been shown suspect photos, and thought one may have been Zodiac. I was just wondering if anybody knows who the kid pointed out? I know that some people over the years had contact with these kids.

Stratcat, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:05 pm
Morf, I think you should get hold of Mike R
I believe he has interviewed the kids.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:03 am
Stratcat wrote:Morf, I think you should get hold of Mike R
I believe he has interviewed the kids.
MikeR does login and post here sometimes, maybe he wil lrespond to this.

zodio, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:12 pm
Brings up something I've written a number of times in past years, that the 3 teens, Foulks, Bryan, and all the other LB witnessess, and Mike too to get his opinion now to look at all the top suspects pics (from different views also) and maybe come to a consensus who the best would be. Also the ear witnessess with recordings as we still don't know if Bryan and Slaught and maybe even Belli's housekeeper have given their opinions.

StitchMallone, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:28 pm
Wow Morf that is a great find and didn't not know that and would also like to know who the kid identified. If the kid help with the sketch I personally don't think it would be any of the top suspects that the kid identified cause to me most of them don't match the sketch.

bayarea60s, Subject: Morf Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:14 am
Do you recall about what area of the FBI Files you saw it mentioned that one of the kids ID'd a suspect? The file I have is like 1200 pgs. So I don't want to start at pg. 1 ...If you recall about where that would be helpful.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:03 am
bayarea60s wrote:Do you recall about what area of the FBI Files you saw it mentioned that one of the kids ID'd a suspect? The file I have is like 1200 pgs. So I don't want to start at pg. 1 ...If you recall about where that would be helpful.
I donty remember, but I think I printed the page someplace. I will look for it.

Theforeigner, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:09 am
Maybe the 8 year old said he/she recognized Mr X due to that mr X lived in the area and the 8 year old had often seen him walke his dog in the neighborhood etc. Maybe even the 8 year old's parents knew Mr X?
Not saying that Mr. X is therefore Zodiac, but Mr X indeed is a very good match to the Stine sketch, and that may be why the 8 YO pointed him out.
Possible conclution; Zodiac look similar to mr X.

Nachtsider, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:49 pm
When was this identification made, morf?

bayarea60s, Subject: Who the 8 Year old ID'd Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:14 am
To all....
I don't know why, or where it came from, and I could be repeating someone else's misinformation, or it may be accurate. But it's in my mind that this is where Kane became a suspect, was from the kid's ID of his mug shot. Don't shoot me for saying this. Maybe someone else out there had also read this somewhere and their memory cells are working better than mine. When Morf mentioned the FBI file, and the kids ID of someone in there I seem to recall looking at it and it was a very short name that was blacked out. Maybe Sandy knows something of this. Not to put you Sandy into the middle of what's clanking around in my head. I just know you're familiar with Kane, maybe you heard or read this also?

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:59 am
Nachtsider wrote:When was this identification made, morf?
I will have to look back and see if i can find it.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sat Mar 10, 2012 7:06 am
morf13 wrote:Nachtsider wrote:When was this identification made, morf?
I will have to look back and see if i can find it.
Found it(at least page 2 of it)...states that the kid identified ______ as a "possible suspect".

There is NO DATE or FILE# on page 2,and I am not about to go back thru thoses hundreds and hundreds of FBI files anytime soon(I save that for days when I am really, really bored

bayarea60s, Subject: Morf Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:03 pm
Oh I hear you there. Not enough time in the world to go back through everything. But thanks for forwarding that page. It tells me it's on one of the page 2's within the report and I now know what the page looks like. I would imagine all such info would be on the surrounding pages to this page.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:47 pm
For what its worth, I dont think that the redacted name belongs to Mr. X as it is too long a name where Mr X's name is short

tahoe27, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:55 pm
Theforeigner wrote:Maybe the 8 year old said he/she recognized Mr X due to that mr X lived in the area and the 8 year old had often seen him walke his dog in the neighborhood etc. Maybe even the 8 year old's parents knew Mr X?
Not saying that Mr. X is therefore Zodiac, but Mr X indeed is a very good match to the Stine sketch, and that may be why the 8 YO pointed him out.
Possible conclution; Zodiac look similar to mr X.
Agreed. I would never discount the description a child provides as they can be more spot-on than an adult at times. I think they notice things differently--more aware of certain things even. But at the same time, I feel it is more likely a "looked like" scenerio.
Would Zodiac really come right back to the scene as a LOCAL not knowing for sure whether someone had seen him? The cops got there so fast. Wouldn't the thought cross the killer's mind that maybe someone saw what happened?
Not only that, but if he really did pass Fouke and Zelms, why the heck would he risk going back and being recognized?
Those kids in no way could describe Zodiac but in a general way. The only person who provided detail was Fouke.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sat Mar 10, 2012 4:51 pm
tahoe27 wrote:Theforeigner wrote:Maybe the 8 year old said he/she recognized Mr X due to that mr X lived in the area and the 8 year old had often seen him walke his dog in the neighborhood etc. Maybe even the 8 year old's parents knew Mr X?
Not saying that Mr. X is therefore Zodiac, but Mr X indeed is a very good match to the Stine sketch, and that may be why the 8 YO pointed him out.
Possible conclution; Zodiac look similar to mr X.
Agreed. I would never discount the description a child provides as they can be more spot-on than an adult at times. I think they notice things differently--more aware of certain things even. But at the same time, I feel it is more likely a "looked like" scenerio.
Would Zodiac really come right back to the scene as a LOCAL not knowing for sure whether someone had seen him? The cops got there so fast. Wouldn't the thought cross the killer's mind that maybe someone saw what happened?
Not only that, but if he really did pass Fouke and Zelms, why the heck would he risk going back and being recognized?
Those kids in no way could describe Zodiac but in a general way.
TAHOE...sorry I meant to quote your post but I accidentally edited it and cut off the end of your post.
You wrote that any detailed description of Z came from Fouke. I seem to recall that he mentioned writing a "scratch" or memo regarding his encounter,but he never actually had anything to do with the sketch? Am I wrong about this? Anybody have specifics on how the sketch was made and if Fouke helped?

tahoe27, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:34 pm
@ Morf: I added it to my original post, but you got the gist.
I was saying he provided detail to the SFPD, not the artist. As far as facts go anyway.
There isn't a snowball's chance in hell those kids would notice a squinty eye or acne, etc.
Fouke's scratch:


tahoe27, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:48 pm
And how did "shuffling lope" get turned into some type of limpy-gimp? Sounds like the guy was just sort of walking sloppily along.
Also as discussed before...did Zodiac walk into the Presidio park area (as mentioned in the above memo) or did he walk up a flight of stairs to a house as mentioned years later by Fouke himself. He obviously lied at some point. Why?

bayarea60s, Subject: T27 Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:09 pm
I've re-enacted this 3 times. Time frame is extremely tight from Foulkes perspective, we're talking maybe 10 seconds tops, from the time he sees Z coming down the hill, until he leaves him at 3713 Jackson St. Foulkes at some point admits that he assumed Z was heading to park. He never saw Z turn on Mason and head towards park. I think somehow with the kids stating they last saw Z heading in direction of park and Foulkes own assumption it became Z went into park.
If only Foulkes had simply did a U-turn as soon as he heard from Pellessetti, called for immediate back up Z would have never gotten away. If Only....

trainmaster, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:28 am
If I remember correctly (and memory is a problem with dementia), the SFPD denies Foulke ever came across Zodiac and
they are even more less than candid about the "revised" sketch and where it came from.
If the two officers did come across the killer, I would think they would be questioned and a (revised) sketch would be
done. I don't know if Zelms made any comment, as he was killed on duty, New Years eve or day 1969 turning to 1970.
From Foulke's statement, it appears as if he got a quick glimpse of a suspect, most likely the killer. As clever as he was, Zodiac knew to try to look as "normal" as possible so he would not attract attention. I think his car was parked at the end of Maple so it was facing north and he would make a quick exit to the Golden Gate Bridge, not far from there.
Yes, the "if only's." If only the racial description of the subject was correct,
if only Foulk had turned around and called for immediate assistance, if only Stein did not substitute for someone else. So many "if only's in the complete story, just as in the Titanic and Lusitania events.

tahoe27, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:04 am
trainmaster wrote:If I remember correctly (and memory is a problem with dementia), the SFPD denies Foulke ever came across Zodiac and
they are even more less than candid about the "revised" sketch and where it came from.
I guess they denied Fouke and Zelms ever STOPPED Zodiac, but the scratch shows at the very least, they (most likely) saw Zodiac--not so much a quick glimpse with a description like that. Heck, it would appear Fouke even glanced back for a look at the back of Zodiac's hair and trousers.

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:14 am
I've wondered if it wasn't SFPD that told Fouke "you did not stop him..". After all, they had enough egg on their face for the NMA broadcast. Here's that footage of his interview back at the time, and him again much later. He may be as honest as the day is long but his tilted head, eye shifts and monotone, almost rehearsed looking delivery don't help him any imo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xE1veHknVo

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:55 pm
bentley wrote:I've wondered if it wasn't SFPD that told Fouke "you did not stop him..". After all, they had enough egg on their face for the NMA broadcast. Here's that footage of his interview back at the time, and him again much later. He may be as honest as the day is long but his tilted head, eye shifts and monotone, almost rehearsed looking delivery don't help him any imo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xE1veHknVo
What I am curious about is, why would Z write a letter and send the Stine shirt if he knew he had just been observed closely by police? Why give them anything at all to go on? He could have kept silent, and never mailed a letter or the shirt pieces, and it would have been just another cabbie shooting. But letting a police get a closeup look at you, the direction you were walking ,etc, you are potentially giving them alot to work with if you are Zodiac. Perhaps his first instinct was to keep quiet, but the thrill of being right uner their noses was too much to keep in.

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:04 pm
Yes, I think that's true. He waited a full month before stating he was the man F&Z saw. He may have felt that in that amount of time, with the composite posted everywhere, he had not been identified, so it was safe to admit the sighting by LE.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:17 pm
bentley wrote:Yes, I think that's true. He waited a full month before stating he was the man F&Z saw. He may have felt that in that amount of time, with the composite posted everywhere, he had not been identified, so it was safe to admit the sighting by LE.
What is weird, if he saw that the police were so close to him, why did he send so quickly a letter & piece of shirt? (a couple days after murder). Even if the sketch wasnt out yet, he had to be a bit nervous.
Something also of note...
Zodiac mails a letter postmarked 11/8/69 (the dripping pen)in it, he seems like his usual happy-go-lucky self...nothing really out of the ordinary.
Then, only one day later, he sends the angry bus bomb letter. He must have read a news article or saw the poster AFTER he had already slipped the previous day's letter into the mail, and had to write a 2nd letter the next day. I am willing to bet that Zodiac,whomever he was,was noticeably nervous, anxious, or otherwise upset the day he mailed that 2nd letter. I would bet he may have missed work that day, been very anxious, or otherwise out of sorts, and it wouldnt surprise me if people that knew him noticed and asked him if anything was wrong.

tahoe27, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:50 pm
^^I think too he was confident he didn't leave a print. A print that would have never been checked against other potential Zodiac prints had Zodiac himself not brought it to light.
I think those cards were planned to be sent like they were. I think there is reasoning behind it. Both to the Chronicle one day apart. The clue to the 340? They are intertwined somehow imo.
Fouke might be the nicest man in the world, but there is something off when he speaks about that night.

onewhoknows, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:15 pm
There is no way to prove that Fouke saw the real Zodiac Killer that night.
San Francisco is a major city, with alot of people walking around.
Years later people are looking for some guy who is 35-45 years old, in spite
of reports by Mike Mageau and dispatchers placing voice recognition as a
youner man. Furthermore, you have a sketch based on eyewitness description,
even if they were young teen agers, and then Kathleen Johns states the man that
gave her a ride looks like the sketch.
The first letter Zodiac sends after Paul Stine's killing makes no mention of the encounter with
Police that evening...was there something in the news? stating the police may
have encountered Zodiac that night. Great opportunity for the real killer to say
"yes that was me". And sending everyone off in the wrong direction...for years.
By the way, it would be nice to have any surviving eyewitnesses to undergo Hypnonosis
to see if they recall more details.

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:55 pm
onewhoknows wrote:The first letter Zodiac sends after Paul Stine's killing makes no mention of the encounter with
Police that evening...was there something in the news? stating the police may
have encountered Zodiac that night.
Nothing in the news. The first the general public knew about the encounter was a month later when Z's letter was published in the Chronicle. Fouke wrote his report corroborating the sighting (but not the conversation) that same day.

trainmaster, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:29 am
I am with "One Who Knows" about so many people walking around in S.F., but not that many in Presidio Heights. That area is, after all, a wealthy area, and many people would be "out of place."
I am not questioning Fouke's varacity - I am wondering why the SFPD denied Fouke encountered the Zodiac - perhaps another cover-up after that mistaken identity broadcast, when they could have caught the guy.....
Whoever broadcast "BMA" instead of WMA" sure must have caught hell for it!

Nachtsider, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:59 am
onewhoknows wrote:There is no way to prove that Fouke saw the real Zodiac Killer that night.
Come on now. Who else could it have been?
The kids said they saw a husky white dude in dark clothes and glasses; Fouke sees a husky dude in dark clothes and glasses. As for the age discrepancy, the answer's pretty obvious - Fouke probably got the age wrong.
trainmaster wrote:Whoever broadcast "BMA" instead of WMA" sure must have caught hell for it!
Wouldn't be surprised to know if that guy wound up killing himself. Wonder who he was.

greg, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:22 am
Foukes input into the composite was that it was close, but maybe just "heavier and beefier" was the only thing he could add. I will re-watch the
Fouke's video from Zodiac the director's cut. This whole stopped or not thing between Pelissetti and Foukes could be just a simple miscommunication or misunderstanding between the two. In police terms "stopped" and "checked out" could or could not mean the same thing. Obviously there was no clarity in what Fouke told Pelissetti..the thing was Zodiac almost got caught and then just disappeared into the night.. I used to live about 7 or 8 blocks from the crime scene and I don't think I'd kill anyone in my neighborhood and not expect anyone to not notice me later on...that's too BIG a risk.

tahoe27, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:29 am
Nachtsider wrote:As for the age discrepancy, the answer's pretty obvious - Fouke probably got the age wrong.
I think so too. He himself wrote the guy's hair appeared to be graying in back, but it could have been lighting. Maybe thinking his hair was possibly graying led Fouke to believe Zodiac was older.

bayarea60s, Subject: Bentley and Tahoe Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:28 am
I totally agree with you folks. It was Z.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:44 am
bayarea60s wrote:I totally agree with you folks. It was Z.
I agree too, its pretty obvious that it was Z.

onewhoknows, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:52 pm
Are you comfortable with the man Foukes saw walking EAST on Jackson?

bayarea60s, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:00 pm
OneWho Knows Asked.....
"Are you comfortable with the man Foukes saw walking EAST on Jackson?"
Heck No. He was the Zodiac Killer. Weak Joke...But yes I'm very comfortable that the man Foulkes saw was the Zodiac. The same man the kids saw with Stine. The same man who first told us of the Foulkes encounter, and then Foulkes concurred, except that he didn't speak with Z. Description, clothes, timing, and Z's admission to seeing Foulkes. If we can't go with all of that, then we're really chasing our tails.

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:54 pm
It is at least mildly curious that 1) Pelissetti says in his interview something like "I feel bad if he (Fouke) feels guilty, I don't think it was Z", however he's likely just trying to smooth things over, and 2) The composite face looks to be of a man on the lighter side. Could be a bulky jacket or whatever. I just don't see any way anyone outside of LE but Z who could have known about the encounter.

Nachtsider, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:28 am
onewhoknows wrote:Are you comfortable with the man Foukes saw walking EAST on Jackson?
I really don't know what you're trying to get at here.

onewhoknows, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:30 am
After stating that he encountered the Police and spoke with them, Zodiac next
says to the cops,"how does it feel to have your nose smeared in your boo boos?" Sounds
like he is trying to insult the police, make fun of them. Are we to believe then that he
planted the fake fingerprints like he claims in the same letter? And yes, the sketch does not
resemble a fat faced man, not like Arthur Leigh Allen for example. Who are we looking for?
Old and fat?

onewhoknows, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:32 am
I would have gone west on Jackson if I were trying to quickly hide into the Presidio.
Just my thoughts though.

Nachtsider, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:32 am
Fake fingerprints? Hell no.
We should look for a heavyset guy in his thirties at the time, and with a full, rounded jaw. The sketch probably flubbed on that last detail.

bayarea60s, Subject: One Who Knows Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:16 am
OneWhoKnows Stated: "I would have gone west on Jackson if I were trying to quickly hide into the Presidio.
Just my thoughts though."
If he had headed west on Jackson he would have been trapped on Jackson until Arguello. Quite a long distance. Z knew this. I think he either planned on heading to Presidio via Cherry, but Pellessetti rolled up on scene before he could get to Jackson, or he never intended to go into Presidio, and headed East on Jackson for his own reasons.
Pellessetti says he was very close to scene when he gets the call. he never identifies where exactly he was at the time of dispatch. I think when he rolled up at Wash/Cherry intersection Z could see him.
After 42+ years I still have questions I'd love to get answered, esp. from Pellessetti.

greg, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:29 am
I ran this scenario in my head and ran it through the actual streets and locations....here's what i think happened, (no disrespect to any other theories)
I think Z had his car pre-parked over the wall along Pacific Ave and Maple in the presidio so that he could make a quick escape. If you drive along Washington, heading west, you can see the Presidio clearly at Maple through the trees and the gate to get through the wall is right there. Being that it was dark, you would have to remember where to exit. For whatever reason, (dog walker?) Z couldn't kill Stine at Maple, so he had Stine pull up one block to Cherry. Z shoots Stine and knows he has to exit via maple as his car is parked closer to the Maple gate. Now, for the naysayers who think Z hung around the immediate area, to watch the cops search for him...all Z had to do to still see all this was head east back towards the city and you can see the whole area right there at Presidio blvd, and Pacific..it's a vast open area towards the Julius Kahn playground. Z could've just sat in his car for a bit at Presidio and Pacific and watched. Then on his whim, drive for just a few seconds and he would be on the Golden Gate bridge.

onewhoknows, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:45 am
I guess we know one thing for sure...the Zodiac killer was there that night
And he killed Paul Stine.... and there were eyewitnesses who produced a likeness,
a sketch... and I guess that's where this all began... all the rest is conjecture (including mine)
I just get frustrated when some folks want to "change" the sketch to fit someone the cops
may have seen later.

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:55 am
I agree Greg, his original Maple destination corroborates his heading back in that direction.
BA60, I was successful in contacting Pelissetti a year or so ago but his answer only raised more confusion. In the DVD, transcript here http://unazod.com/odd/transcript.htm, it indicates he spoke to Fouke AFTER going down Jackson and talking to the dog walker. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense, since Z would have to have been in hiding when he walked by, so I thought maybe it was just the way the interview was edited. So I emailed Pelissetti, he said that's the way it happened. Perhaps he's forgotten after so long.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:04 pm
bentley wrote:I agree Greg, his original Maple destination corroborates his heading back in that direction.
BA60, I was successful in contacting Pelissetti a year or so ago but his answer only raised more confusion. In the DVD, transcript here http://unazod.com/odd/transcript.htm, it indicates he spoke to Fouke AFTER going down Jackson and talking to the dog walker. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense, since Z would have to have been in hiding when he walked by, so I thought maybe it was just the way the interview was edited. So I emailed Pelissetti, he said that's the way it happened. Perhaps he's forgotten after so long.
Both of these guys have changed their stories over the years, thats for sure.

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:38 pm
You're probably right, but I can't remember Pelissetti ever wavering, refresh my memory.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:41 pm
bentley wrote:You're probably right, but I can't remember Pelissetti ever wavering, refresh my memory.
Maybe 'changed their stories' is not what I should have said. Fouke definitely changed his story,why I dont know. Pelissetti and Foike flat out disagreed with each other regarding the night's events. On the documentary, Pelissetti states something and Fouke flat out says it is NOT true. So one of them is mistaken or lying. Or maybe after all these years, their memories are failing.

bayarea60s, Subject: Greg Tue Mar 13, 2012 8:09 pm
Greg....
It could have happened that way. I would think Z may have been concerned about road blocks. The GG Bridge, that's the obvious, it sits right there bigger than life, but if you've ever entered the Bridge from the Presidio again one cop car stops you from getting there and you could be real obvious trying to turn around there to avoid cop. He knows a cop can ID him. We don't know what Foulkes did once on Pacific other than drive through, did he just leave? You wouldn't think so. You would figure he'd wait for some back-up, then it would be almost impossible for Z to move from Pacific. So many scenarios, possiblities. He says he was in hiding, I think he was. I think if he had a getaway car that's what he would have used it for, if he could. If he saw Pellessetti, and I think he not only saw Pellessetti, but hid from him on Jackson, and then as soon as he comes out from hidiing from Pellessetti, he runs into Foulkes. I would think he'd want to bury himself ASAP. He would think the place is swarmng with cops. To me if he had a car on the other side of the wall on Pacific and Maple, he would have jumped into it and been out of there. At the time he doesn't know that cops are going to focus themselves in Kahn Park/Presidio, they didn't know. So why would he place himself in view of the Park if he doesn't know where cops are going to focus on?

bayarea60s, Subject: The DVD & what Bentley is told Tue Mar 13, 2012 8:51 pm
The DVD and what Bentley has shared here that Pellessetti (I'll call Him P), Foulkes (Is F) shared in the DVD is what his movements were was a real eye opener to me. Until the DVD I always thought P & F were answering the same dispatch and wondered how P got the kids back to their house, got their story, went and checked on Stine, confirmed him dead, (then says he couldn't get back to the radio fast enough, I don't think he did go to the radio). Anyhow I always thought P did what he did @ Wash & Cherry, then went in search of killer, and when he got to Jackson he ran into F.
Apparently what happened is P rolls up on scene, he never says where he was when he got the call, only that he got there very quickly. As he pulls up the kids come out from the house and start for the cab. P gets out of his car, intercepts the kids, he doesn't know where Z is, and ushers them back to their house, gets their story, supposedely goes back to dispatch, tells them this is a murder and perp isn't black, he's white. I don't think so. That would mean dispatch blows it a 2nd time, by not updating cops of the perp change and that perp is an armed murderer. Then P heads N. on Cherry looking for a killer, takes some time, then turns on Jackson and heads E. to Maple, all the while checking for the killer. At Maple he sees an older gentleman walking his dog, asks him if he has seen anyone, old guy says no. P turns and heads back on Jackson going W. When he gets to Cherry, F. pulls up, 15 secs. earlier F. sees Z.
Where was Z all this time? He wasn't moving, or he would have never seen F. He must have been in hiding from P? Correct.
If P called in the perp change & that it's a murder, how does F not get that message? Upwards of 10 minutes have past and dispatch simply doesn't tell cops out there on the streets there's an armed murderer? That error would be far bigger than the original dispatch error of reporting a BMA vs, WMA.
For decades I thought F. story had changed, but I'm not sure he hasn't been the more consistent. He always stuck to his timeline and what took place with Z. P to date his timeline well he doesn't say where he was when he got the initial call. if he did we could figure almost to the second when he would have pulled up at scene. He says in the DVD once the kids told him the story, "Well I couldn't get back to that radio fast enough and give dispatch the update", but he doesn't really say that's what he did. And if he did, then why doesn't dispatch update all the cops out there? That to me would have become the bigger story than the first slip up by dispatch.

trainmaster, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:50 pm
One thing is for sure: at the time of the murder, police thought it was a routine robbery. They never connected "Z" with the crime until after his first letter. Thus, I agree with Greg that "Z" parked his car at the bottom of Maple or on Pacific in a west direction to make a quick exit to the Golden Gate Bridge. If there were any (and I doubt) road blocks, he would have made it before they were set up.
Remember, they weren't even thinking of Zodiac at the time - there were already several cab robberies recently and to LE, this was another one gone bad. After receipt of the first letter, the SFPD knew who they were really dealing with.

bayarea60s, Subject: Train Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:31 am
While they didn't of course know it was Z. Pellessetti was investigating a murder. All of SFPD was investigating a murder some 15 minutes or so after the crime was committed, (that's probably very quick notification from the typical murder case). Z would have beat the roadblocks (if there had been any) only if he left the scene. If he lingers, esp. if his car is parked on Pacific right by Maple, he'd be at the epicenter of the investigation.

bayarea60s, Subject: If Z had a car Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:51 am
If Z had a car parked on Pacific, by Maple, or anywhere near Maple, he could have been in it and gone before Foulkes would have even been that far down on Pacific. if he brought a getaway car, why wouldn't he do that immediately with it. He doesn't have any idea where cops are going to look. Once I think about it to presume Z would hang down in that area sitting in a car really has no merit. To say he had somewhere to go to, to hang out, now that's another story.
The car thing has been kicked around for a long time, but really think of it, all the action's up at Cherry and Wash, no reason at all for Z to have prepared his getaway and then not use it, but just sit, cause he would naturally assume the investigation would go to the Presidio, or wherever he parked his car. It just doesn't make sense.

greg, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:06 am
I think you mis-interpreted what i was trying to say Bayarea60s, I am saying that a quick getaway could have been accomplished by exiting through the wall at Maple..Z's car could have been parked there as it is almost the perfect place to escape the area from. Then if Z drives North-west, he has the Golden Gate Bridge right there, if he drives East to say, Presidio Blvd., or further, he is in the wash of the city and virtually mixed in to a main part of the city amongst the hustle and bustle..and easily disappear into that concrete jungle. What I implicated is that at Presidio Blvd and Pacific avenue...you can see that whole part of Julius Kahn playground and that part of Pacific...very easily...and be maybe 300 hundred yards away, but still in a busy part of the city. i wish I could upload maps.

bayarea60s, Subject: Greg Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:31 am
I know the area well. Did 3 re-enactments at the scene over the years. So follow the timeframe of what you state. Z is at 3713 Jackson St., so is Foulkes. F says he hit the gas and headed W. on Jackson, within 10 secs. he's at Cherry, sees P, they talk, F now knows he's after a killer, and probably just let him go. F decides to continue W. on Jackson to Arguello, and he's not travelling 35-40 any longer, he's flying. Turns R. on Arguello & continues to Pacific. Gets to Pacific and turns R. How much time do you think has elapsed since he left 3713 Jackson? 1 min. maybe 1 1/2 minutes. where's Z?
Well if he parked his car right on Pacific on the other side of Maple, in that time he has made it to his car, but he doesn't have time to waste. As Foulkes now heads E. on Pacific he's looking for any movement, which would include the tail lights of a car ahead, maybe someone getting away. he sees nothing. Maybe Z got to the car even quicker and got out of there before Foulkes is heading down Pacific, it's possible I guess. So Z's home free, turns L. on Presidio, L. on Marina, and is off to GG Bridge.
So why if Z's plan works and he gets away, would he only pull up to the top of the hill and stop. To watch the show? there's no show, how much time elapses before the first units roll up to search the park? And z who can be ID'd by 2 cops is going to just hang on Pacific for no reason. That's why I've never liked the getaway car idea. If his car's around Maple and Jackson/Pacific, then his getaway worked and he's gone. But we know he didn't leave the area. We know he wasn't in the park.
And I see no reason why he would stay at the epicenter of the search, when he could get away, and had no idea the cops would be even looking in the park at all.
I'm sure Foulkes has played this out 100 times in his mind and knows if he had turned a u-ey on Cherry and gone right back to where he left Z, he'd have a clear view down Jackson and could determine if Z headed that way, or S. on Maple, or N. towards the park, he could let Zelm's out to go on foot on Maple towards park, they would have caught Z for sure. May have gotten ugly though.
And if they couldn't find him at all, they would know he was hold up somewhere in the neighborhood, he wouldn't have had time to get out of area. I really think he had a place to go and that's where he stayed. I just don't see the car scenario at all.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:07 am
Good discussion guys.
I agree, I dont think Z would have sat around in his car, or hid behind a tree, etc watching 'the show' (especially if he was blood covered). There is one other possibility,what if he lived nearby,not likely IMO, or at least he didnt own the home, but he could have been house sitting for a friend or relative. As I recall, weren't there hotels closeby too?

Quagmire, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:02 am
If Z was a fit young soldier based at the Presidio, I wonder how easy it would have been for him to head back there that night immediately after shooting Stine? It would seem that he headed towards that way and by stating in his letter that he went into the park just to hide for a while, he might have been trying to mislead anyone who reported seeing him head in that direction?
It seems by far the simplest explanation to me but then I do not know the area personally so I'm not sure if Z could have got to the Presidio base without being intercepted? Could anyone comment on this?

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:14 am
Z made some claims in his Nov 9 letter to prove he was in the park; fire trucks, groups of motorcycles, dogs, where they were and where he was, and while not certain proof, they are claims that could be refuted by LE were it not the case.
Getting back to Pelissetti's claim that he went all the way down Jackson and back prior to seeing Fouke, what then took Fouke so long to get there? He was only a half dozen blocks away, can't remember exactly where. Did he not respond to the first call the P got, and responded to a second, still NMA APB? Did dispatch put out a quick call to Wash and Maple as soon as the kids called, then a second call after getting more details?

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:19 am
bentley wrote:Z made some claims in his Nov 9 letter to prove he was in the park; fire trucks, groups of motorcycles, dogs, where they were and where he was, and while not certain proof, they are claims that could be refuted by LE were it not the case.
He certainly could have been washing from the woods, his car, or a nearby house. I leaan towards a house. If you're Z, and you just killed somebody and are walking down the street, and a cop passes you and looks at you,you have to feel alot of relief that they didnt stop you. Do you push your luck and hang out on foot in the area? I dont think so. Could he have blended in with 'concerned citizens' that came out on the street to look around? That's possible, but then again, are you wearing blood soaked clothes? Makes it unlikely. Watching from the safety of a window with your lights out makes perfect sense to me. ZERO RISK.

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:48 am
According to Jim Dean's interview with the Robbin's kids, Z was still in site on Cherry when Pelissetti arrived, but by the time the kids got Pelissetti to look Z was gone. I can envision as scenario in which Z, somewhere on the corner of Cherry and Jackson, sees Pelissetti start off down Cherry, and as Z starts off down Jackson, he realizes he's got his back to Pelissetti and is not likely to make it all the way to Maple before Pelissetti gets to Jackson, so he ducks in somewhere (maybe the stairs Fouke mentions) while Pelissetti passes by twice, then comes out as Pelissetti is headed back towards Cherry thinking he's in the clear, then Fouke comes along.

bayarea60s, Subject: Quag Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:03 pm
Once Z got onto Pacific, if that's the way he went, he would first have to hide from Foulkes and then head west into the Presidio. If he has blood on himself it may be hard to go unnoticed. He wasn't in uniform.

bayarea60s, Subject: Bentley Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:15 pm
Bentely Stated:
"Z made some claims in his Nov 9 letter to prove he was in the park; fire trucks, groups of motorcycles, dogs, where they were and where he was, and while not certain proof, they are claims that could be refuted by LE were it not the case."
By Nov. 9th all that info had been posted in the news. In his initial letter he only mentions the motorcicles...He doesn't mention the dogs, fire trucks, etc.
Bentley Stated:
"Getting back to Pelissetti's claim that he went all the way down Jackson and back prior to seeing Fouke, what then took Fouke so long to get there? He was only a half dozen blocks away, can't remember exactly where. Did he not respond to the first call the P got, and responded to a second, still NMA APB? Did dispatch put out a quick call to Wash and Maple as soon as the kids called, then a second call after getting more details?"
Well that's why Pellessetti's statement on the DVD and to you is so important. If in fact that's the way it happened there's no way Foulkes is responding to the same dispatch as Pellessetti. F would be responding to a dispatch some 10 mins. later, and the dispatch wouldn't have the update of the suspect being white, or looking for a murderer, which is suspicious considering what Pellessetti says on the DVD, "I couldn't get back to that radio fast enough". I don't think he made the update to dispatch. And what was Pita doing the whole time? Pel. doesn't say...

bayarea60s, Subject: Bentley.... Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:35 pm
Yeah I'd love to know exactly where P was when he got the dispatch. If he was as close as Foulkes was, course P. was coming from the other direction, but if he was within a minute of the scene then there's no way Z would be at Jackson yet. So Z would see P. rolling up. If you google map 3713 Jackson St. and do the street view, then go up about 2 houses towards Cherry, there's a house with a kind of steep driveway that bends to the left into the garage. You can stand halfway down that driveway and have a clear view of P. walking east on jackson. Course Z could have been hdiing behind a parked car also, but that might be riskier. When Foulkes first sees Z, he's only seconds from Z heading up the stairs at 3713 Jackson, Z is walking downhill heading E. on Jackson on the N. side of Jackson. Once P. has gone back up Jackson towards Cherry, there's a point there where Z could come out continue down Jackson heading E. and P wouldn't be able to see him.

bayarea60s, Subject: Morf.... Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:41 pm
Morf....
I think he had a place to go to, a house, a friend's place, maybe he was doing work on a house. Course Z wouold give cops a mis-direction saying he was in park cause if he even hinted he was at a house the cops would figure out which house. If I were in Z's position I'd rather be on foot then in a car. I can hide anywhere on foot, but in a car, I'm pretty well stuck on the road I'm on. I can't do anything abruptly in a car to avoid a cop. On foot I simply turn into anywhere, hide behind a car, etc. I've always felt Z was hiding at a house.

bentley, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:42 pm
The transcript link I posted yesterday is no longer working, this one is http://unazod.com/odd/transcript.htm
Fouke — My regular partner was off. I don't recall the reason why he was not working that night. However, Eric Zelms was assigned as my partner that night. We were patrolling the eastern side of the Richmond district, going northbound on Presidio Avenue. We had passed Washington Street when a broadcast came in of a shooting at Cherry and Washington Street.
A broadcast of a shooting? The kids didn't know anything about a shooting, they heard no gunshot. According to Pelissetti, the original call was for a robbery/assault. The initial call should not have mentioned a shooting, so perhaps that shows Fouke responded to a later call. Or he's just forgotten..

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:44 pm
bayarea60s wrote:Morf....
I think he had a place to go to, a house, a friend's place, maybe he was doing work on a house. Course Z wouold give cops a mis-direction saying he was in park cause if he even hinted he was at a house the cops would figure out which house. If I were in Z's position I'd rather be on foot then in a car. I can hide anywhere on foot, but in a car, I'm pretty well stuck on the road I'm on. I can't do anything abruptly in a car to avoid a cop. On foot I simply turn into anywhere, hide behind a car, etc. I've always felt Z was hiding at a house.
I agree, certainlt could have had a 'safehouse' in mind. For what it's worth, there were entries in Darlene's address book in the general area of the Stine murder (within walking distance anyhow). Also, one of the theater companies that performed the Mikado, was pretty close by as well...always wondered if one of their members could be Zodiac,of course I am sure they were looked at closely.

morf13, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:57 pm
Just for the hell of it, I will list all of the San Fran addresses from Darlene's book here. Perhaps Bentley could put them all on a map along with the Washington & Cherry crime scene????
191 Fredrick St
1819 OAK? OAKS? cant read it, you can see it here:
http://www.zodiackiller.com/DeeBook3.html
421 Leavenworth
903 Ashbury
10 geary
18 Stoneyford
2746 Golden Gate
2147 Bay St
2425 Geary
1250 Eddy
601 Pana Rama
1259 Bush
???? Burnette St?...cant read it, seen here:
http://www.zodiackiller.com/DeeBook12.html
455 Eddy
973 Haight St
1437 Clement
??? Larkin St
230 Funston
2310 28th Ave
Certainly interesting that most of the addresses of Darlene's are SF, and not Vallejo,of course she had lived there. A couple things I noticed about her address book was that she knew somebody in StateLine (Donna Lass), and the one obvious person I see in Albany (Joseph Mahar)had previously been arrested in the SF bay area for armed robbery. There is an article about him on page one of this thread:
http://zodiackillersite.forummotion.com ... dress-book
The above thread also has other discussion about Darlene's address book

Zamantha, Subject: Re: Stine crime scene witnesses Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:37 pm
Morf, yes 1819 Oak St. Which is in the Panhandle area. Process Church was on that street. And Stine's home wasn't too far away, as it was across the Panhandle.
It would be interesting to see a map show all the locations! Great idea!











