Zodiackillersite.com

The only possible cause for the intraparenchymal haemorrhages that I can think of is that Paul may have sustained trauma to his thorax in a struggle with Zodiac, perhaps from it hitting the steering wheel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraparen ... hemorrhage
His thorax was in his head?
How confusing!

smithy wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraparenchymal_hemorrhage
His thorax was in his head?
How confusing!

Well, Smithy, parenchyma isn't a term exclusive to brain tissue. Lungs have parenchyma, too; Seagull and the autopsy report were referring to lung parenchyma.

Nacht - yes they do. I was being smug 'cos I thought those references were originally on different pages, but no, they weren't were they.
http://web.archive.org/web/200901052141 ... ine_3.html
How very odd!

Oh, when you said he had a thorax in his head, I just assumed it was another Norse reference. 'Cause that would make sense, too.

G

ggluckman wrote:Oh, when you said he had a thorax in his head, I just assumed it was another Norse reference. 'Cause that would make sense, too.

G

'Cept Thor had a hammer but not bad lol.

traveller1st wrote:

ggluckman wrote:Oh, when you said he had a thorax in his head, I just assumed it was another Norse reference. 'Cause that would make sense, too.

G

'Cept Thor had a hammer but not bad lol.

Gotta do your homework, Trav:

http://marvel.wikia.com/Thread:626790

BAM!!!


G

Stine's autopsy report:

http://web.archive.org/web/200812182118 ... html#Stine

QT

Craigfitzer wrote:That's right faraday was shot behind the right ear.

No he wasn't. That isn't right. Why would you say that? FFS he was shot behind the left ear.Look, I'm sorry I don't mean to be so rude but there's enough misinformation in this case already. Why, why would you would agree with the comment that he was shot behind the right ear? I can forgive thinking it, we all think lots of things, but don't f**king post without at least googling it. Oh but don't take my word for it.



I'm not mad at you Craig, it's just this 'culture' of posting and saying things as if it's true. Sorry to use your misdiscretion as an example. But you gave me a great example to work from by starting with "That's right", it's not 'right', it's not even true.

Truth is we don't the truth. Don't just say. Say I thought, or I heard, or didn't someone say. We are all working in the dark. Even with each other so don't assume.

I think things too lol but i've learned through my own mistakes to look and seek validation or consensus, even if that's ultimately wrong or unlikely.

This is a forum, not a blog, so be be prepared to leave your assumptions and ideals ... and principles (you know who you are) at the door.

Welsh Chappie wrote:

traveller1st wrote:Hard to know. They were soaked in blood though weren't they? Still could have been left by another fare and Z just used them for something?

That was a good question Dag and I'm not sure I've seen it asked before. I got a confused impression as well WC reading the chat log regarding Carol's seemingly definite no regarding were Z was riding in the cab. Given where Paul was shot though it does seem more convenient that the shooter was in the back seat.

WC, were the gloves where you said they were? I'm asking because I can't remember and for whatever reason I thought they were in the back seat.

As for Z knowing Paul. Is it possible that he knew him but as a fare and not necessarily in everyday life. I mean, could Paul have had recourse to pick up Z up on a few occassions or is that unlikely?

The gloves were found on the floor in the front passenger side of Paul's cab.

Can you direct me to the proof of this rather than just making a statement. Thanks.