Revised composite sketch

Discussion of Zodiac Victim Paul Stine

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby Tahoe27 » Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:57 am

entropy wrote:In thinking about OWK's question about the likelihood that Fouke and Zelms actually encountered Zodiac, this question came to mind:

Was this encounter made public at all prior to Fouke's written memo?

I looked back through a few of the newspaper articles a month or so after the Stine murder and didn't see any indication that it was. In fact, the 10/18/69 Chronicle article that calls Z a "clumsy criminal" refers to him as "allowing himself to be seen by three witnesses as he fled from the Presidio Heights murder scene". No mention of any encounter with police...

http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/art ... 615336.php

The article also calls out Zodiac for lying about remaining near the scene after the murder, stating "Lee (Chief of Inspectors, Marvin Lee) said the fact that Zodiac failed to mention the dogs and floodlights proves "he wasn't anywhere in the vicinity." Zodiac then responds to this article almost point for point in his Bus Bomb letter on 11/9/13 and claims to have had a brief conversation with "two cops" a short distance from the scene. Could Z have known this occurred without being there? His actual account of the encounter may or may not be true but, if the encounter wasn't made public, it would confirm that he was the person seen by Fouke, no?


Yes. I always thought Zodiac referring to the 2 cops was pretty much the proof needed that he was the guy they saw. I mention this on the previous page.

I doubt it became public info until Zelms was killed. If it even did then, I don't know.
Image

"...they may be dealing with one or more ersatz Zodiacs--other psychotics eager to get into the act, or perhaps even other murderers eager to lay their crimes at the real Zodiac's doorstep." L.A. Times, 1969
User avatar
Tahoe27
 
Posts: 5279
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:13 pm

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby entropy » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:52 am

Apologies for continually writing "13" rather than "69" when dates are cited. I just hope I'm not constantly writing "69" every time I date something at work. :oops:
entropy
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:59 am

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby smithy » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:12 am

entropy wrote:In thinking about OWK's question about the likelihood that Fouke and Zelms actually encountered Zodiac, this question came to mind:
Was this encounter made public at all prior to Fouke's written memo?


What's public? Public in-the-newspapers public, or "known about in the SFPD" public, or ....?
I personally do NOT think that Zodiac referring to the 2 cops is proof that he was there. Especially not so long after the fact.....
Now - a piece of shirt with blood on it? That's another thing entirely.

Entropy - 13 instead of 69? Yes, that's, err, odd. Beware.

Back to topic - the second sketch has been "aged" to include age lines and wrinkles on the face and neck and that receding hairline - the primary purpose for re-visiting it. No?
User avatar
smithy
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:19 am

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby morf13 » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:30 am

Tahoe27 wrote:^^I understand what you are saying entropy. The timing of Fouke's memo has always sparked an interest. I too believe it was Zodiac's letter that triggered it. I just question why it was have been addressed to Armstrong and Toschi like it was new info for them. Maybe it was...

It would just seem the teens are the ones who initially said Zodiac was in his early 40's. So wondering where the 25-30 comment on the original came from.


Maybe there was another witness we dont know about? There was a kid,aged 8 years old in one of the FBI reports that picked out ________as a possible suspect in the Stine murder. From what we can gather, this 8 year old was NOT one of the kids in the window that called it in.


Also, regarding the kids overall description, I think that across the street,at night,and while they were very excited and upset at what they were seeing,their descriptions may not be dead on. I have 20/20 vision, but at night from across a street, I think I may even have trouble telling somebody's age.
User avatar
morf13
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6747
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:48 am
Location: NJ

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby morf13 » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:32 am

Tahoe27 wrote:^^I understand what you are saying entropy. The timing of Fouke's memo has always sparked an interest. I too believe it was Zodiac's letter that triggered it. I just question why it was have been addressed to Armstrong and Toschi like it was new info for them. Maybe it was...

It would just seem the teens are the ones who initially said Zodiac was in his early 40's. So wondering where the 25-30 comment on the original came from.


What exactly do you mean by this Tahoe? Do you think Z wrote the letter, and then Fouke wanted to get himself involved in the case by saying he saw Z?? I was wondering the same thing, but wouldnt/couldnt Zelms have shot that down immediately if it was not true?
User avatar
morf13
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6747
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:48 am
Location: NJ

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby entropy » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:06 pm

I think Tahoe is saying that Fouke's memo was written in response to Zodiac demanding in his 11/9/69 letter for the Chronicle to publish his claim about being stopped by police and allegedly having a brief verbal interaction. Whether or not wanted that known or whether he realizes the significance of the contact, he really had no choice but to officially report the incidence once he was called out by Zodiac. His report was completed 11/12/69- a month after it occurred but only a day or two after Z's letter was received.
entropy
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:59 am

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby Tahoe27 » Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:26 pm

entropy wrote:I think Tahoe is saying that Fouke's memo was written in response to Zodiac demanding in his 11/9/69 letter for the Chronicle to publish his claim about being stopped by police and allegedly having a brief verbal interaction. Whether or not wanted that known or whether he realizes the significance of the contact, he really had no choice but to officially report the incidence once he was called out by Zodiac. His report was completed 11/12/69- a month after it occurred but only a day or two after Z's letter was received.


Yes.

The whole damn thing is so frustrating. If it was Fouke who led officers into the park, why hadn't Armstrong and Toschi already talked to him already? I mean, the cops who probably saw Zodiac didn't talk to the lead investigators until they got a MEMO? The whole this is weird.
Image

"...they may be dealing with one or more ersatz Zodiacs--other psychotics eager to get into the act, or perhaps even other murderers eager to lay their crimes at the real Zodiac's doorstep." L.A. Times, 1969
User avatar
Tahoe27
 
Posts: 5279
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:13 pm

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby Nachtsider » Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:48 pm

Fouke mentioned that SOMEONE spoke to him down at the Richmond station that very night after the search was called off. My guess is that there was either a communications breakdown, or Fouke's initial testimony was simply not put into writing.
Nachtsider
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:01 am

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby onewhoknows » Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:25 am

I think the interior light from the cab lit up during the teenagers observation. The boy went down stairs and watched from the darkness.
San Francisco also has street lights.
onewhoknows
 

Re: Revised composite sketch

Postby entropy » Tue Nov 05, 2013 3:38 am

Tahoe27 wrote:
onewhoknows wrote:Yes, Foukes police report confession just states he saw Zodiac walk east on Jackson and North on Maple which is a court near the Presidio.
What did the kids say Zodiac was wearing, did they describe the windbreaker in blue and rust colored pants. The kids did not describe an
older man with blond or greying hair. What a mess.


Actually, this is what was written in the police report the night of Stine's murder. I take it THIS is the description given by the teens. If so, it would seem the info on the initial composite WAS incorrect and changed to reflect what was originally in the pd report.

(Fouke also admits the hair MAY have appeared to look as if it were graying due to the lighting. Other than that...damn close, imo. Fouke clearly states the man was seen going INTO the Presidio and the direction of the Julius Kahn playground.)

Image


Well that's just weird. Why the hell would the wanted poster then contradict the eyewitnesses' age estimates? It wasn't taking into account other Zodiac witnesses because nobody knew this was Zodiac at the time. It still makes me wonder whether Fouke's observations weren't immediately taken into account, although he may not have known for sure that he saw the same guy until Zodiac wrote to say "yeah, that was me". Even if the teens estimate was early 40s and somehow misrepresented initially (which I doubt), the revision somehow became "35-45" to mirror Fouke's later estimate. Either way, the 35-45 estimate was not just pulled out of thin air. It's a clear outlier but it's eyewitness testimony to be taken for what it's worth.
entropy
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:59 am

PreviousNext

Return to Paul Stine 10/11/69

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron