Welsh Chappie wrote:He could have been recognized as 'Zodiac' also Smithy.
Correct! By an eagle-eyed VNC reader with a good memory, at least, I guess.
San Francisco wire (UPI) were still calling him "the Cipher Killer" on the 5th, and the Vallejo News-Chronicle PUBLICISED the second letter (the August 4th letter), on the 5th, but they didn't PUBLISH it. They mentioned that the author was the "Zodiac," yes, but not as a splash - and the Chronicle didn't, nope.
It wasn't picked up by "main stream" news media, this "The Zodiac Killer" name, until post-Berryessa. So I didn't call him Zodiac. And he didn't call himself Zodiac at Berryessa either. He was small beer at the time, as Nacht says.
Does this matter much? Well, not in this context, nope.
Here's the VNC - ahead of the pack it seems with the name, but publishing an awful lot of other garbage about astrology, ho ho.
I expect we have Seagull to thank for turning it up in the first place.
Don't miss the cut-in at the bottom right.
(And I get a kick out of the third paragraph too, of course. Well, I would.

)
