Re: Hair
The hair from BRS to LB is what concerns me. He would have HAD to be wearing a wig at LB. It's just that, I too, find far-fetched. The only explanation would be that he WANTED to be seen by some that day...the three girls for example, and wanted them to describe his looks. If that is the case, and it was Zodiac, it must have been a wig.
Or a different person altogether.
This article came out on October 1, 1969. I wonder why Zodiac didn't offer what was "held back" (by knife) until over a year later? He could have easily proven he was the person who did this at the time. And why no rebuttal to his looks with this case?

Or a different person altogether.
This article came out on October 1, 1969. I wonder why Zodiac didn't offer what was "held back" (by knife) until over a year later? He could have easily proven he was the person who did this at the time. And why no rebuttal to his looks with this case?
