by BillRobison » Sat Aug 02, 2014 9:44 am
If you compare the Chronicle article about BRS of July 6, 1969, to Hoffman's report (the only report which was typed before July 8) it seems the reporter (no byline) had a copy of Hoffman's report as he wrote his story. Zodiacs first two letters duplicate a laundry list of misspelled words, the use of "thus," that suggest he ALSO not only had a copy of Hoffman's report, but oddly enough, he corrects the July 6 article by pointing out that the "window was rolled own all ready," instead of the reporters claim that police were told the "door was torn open." Interestingly, that July 6 article states seven shell casings were found. Hoffman's report states he found seven shell casings. But Lynch found two more, but Zodiac doesn't point out that "seven shell caseings" is wrong. He only points out that the article was wrong about the door/window.
Hoffman's report also mentions Meyring and Lindemann stopped Andy N. Jr leaving the scene slowly and quietly. BOTH Mike Mageau AND George Bryant told police the shooter left fast and furious. So we know he did. But Zodiac claims to be the guy in Hoffman's report who left slowly and quietly (15 to 20 minutes after the shooting actually took place at 11:55.)
No one has seen a newspaper article that mentions Andy Jr. The killer was long gone, so how could HE know about him? But Zodiac did. Just like he knew about the blonde guy Fouke and Zelms saw walking toward the park. He wasn't mentioned in the papers either, so how could Stine's killer know about him? He was young, 150 or so pounds, with brown hair. Fouke's suspect was 40s, 200 plus, with blonde hair possibly mixed with gray. He can't be the killer, and he wasn't mentioned in the papers, but Zodiac claimed to BE him.
That report of Hoffman's says he was in that lot about 11:55, the time of the shooting, but didn't see Darlene's car there. Villareal told VPD that HE went by there at 11:55, but didn't see Darlene's car there. Does that make Hoffman a suspect? Or did Zodiac just have a copy of Hoffman's report? A reporter from the Chronicle did, and Zodiac scolded him for lying about it.
Rusts report of his interview of Mike (not the transcript of the interview, Rusts report of it) showed up almost verbatim in the Times Herald the next day. Except for one detail, which Zodiac helpfully provided in one of his letters. Again, a reporter has a copy of a VPD report, and again, Zodiac "corrects" him on it. (The part about Mike ending up in the back seat.)
Weird. But not the weirdest thing. The papers reported several times that Mike had been shot in the thigh (true). Zodiac insisted twice that Mike "was also shot in the knee; that's how I shot him in the knee" (false). But Hoffman's report mentions that it looked like Mike had been shot in the LOWER left leg. Below the thigh. Which Zodiac claims twice, erroneously, actually happened.
Zodiac wasn't telling Dear Editor things Dear Editor didn't know. He was telling Dear Editor things Zodiac could prove Dear Editor DID know, but was stating wrong in his newspapers.
Weird, indeed.