Just thinking about the who LHR incident again. I have mentioned the idea that Zodiac may have been there on foot and listed several reasons why this theory is plausable. But today I have been looking over the scene and reports and noticed something that seems to suggest that if Zodiac was in a vehicle at LHR, it's unlikely that he parked his vehicle where the one witness said he saw a second vehicle parked. What we know for sure is this;
Zodiac shot David at point blank range while he was either exiting the vehicle's passenger door, or while standing outside next to it. He fell to the ground where he was and a large pool of blood was found around the head area of the body.
It's then assumed that Betty, in reaction to seeing this, attempts to flee from the gunman. We know, based on the shell casings found, that Zodiac didn't run or chase Betty, but remained at the passenger side door of the Rambler while shooting Betty. One bullet hole on Betty's dress was found to have a trace of gun power residue on it that lead some to conclude that Betty was within arms length of Zodiac when he fired his first shot. (If Betty were sat in the passenger side with David outside her open door with Zodiac, seeing him shot and fall to the ground would have probably caused her to try and instantly exit the vehicle and run. unfortunately Zodiac was standing right in her path of escape and as she straightened up from exiting the car, he may have shot her almost point blank in the back) Either way, bettey didn't get but 20 ft.
One interesting website I read earlier stated something that I was not aware of, that being, when Betty Lou fell to the ground, she did so by falling backwards. As the website author note's, this is against the law's of psysics. If a person is moving foreward at speed, ir running, and for whatever reason begins to fall, they will always and without exception, fall foreward. If Betty was running from the shooter at the time she fell, the momentum would have carried her in that same foreward direction untill she fell. Anyway, thats just a side note to think of, here the oddity...
Police reports say that between David and Betty's body's (20 ft), there was a visable trail of blood. So if Zodiac was parked where witness Owens claims to have seen the second vehicle, whether it be 5 ft or 10 ft to the right of the Rambler (he gave 4-5 ft in his first statement, then 10 ft in a seconds statement) doesn't matter. There is now a visable trail of blood spanning almost the entire parking area. This now presents a situation where Zodiac, when leaving the scene and driving between Betty's and David's bodies, has to drive through the trail of blood! Yet, no tracks found in any blood, no blood reported as appearing smeared as if driven over.
"So it's sorta social. Demented and sad, but social, right?" Judd Nelson.