I don't think it was out of view but I think that, for whatever reason, Owens had less of a chance to 'observe' it clearly. I was pitch black wasn't it? so the only window of opportunity is within what's in your headlights and for how long. That is affected by your speed, the setting on your beams and where your attention is focused regarding the road and how the road turns and how you drive yourself approaching a turn.
Was saying I guess that there's plenty of variables that could account for Owen's 'uncertain' description of the second car and variables that I don't consider unlikely.
The on foot thing hasn't been ruled out by myself either I have to say. I was thinking about that and there's no reason to assume he wasn't. I mean consider PH, he was on foot, technically, ie he didn't drive away in his own vehicle from the scene, he walked.....perhaps to where his car was? The reason we do is because of Owen's sighting of a second car. Is there a reason that second car had to be Zodiac's? I know the window is tight but is it tight enough for that not to be Zodiac but another random couple who pulled in and then changed their mind? Or something? Zodiac waiting in the shadows and observing the scene before striking. He might have been at that at BRS. Observe, drive in, leave, no one passing then drive back and go for it. Even for blitz attacks he seems to employ some sort of precursor. Like on the spot casing.
It's a curious one, this crime, but for whatever reason I can't discount Zodiac having pulled it off. By that I mean that I feel it was him and not anyone we know, at least not anyone we know that was there that night. Ah who knows, I lose focus halfway some posts lol. Good discussions though.
