Cragle wrote:I just don’t understand what they would have to gain from this. Why admit they have DNA (assuming that it is true), before they have used it to indentifing anybody yet. surely they would keep this close to their chest, why would you possible tell Z that your were onto him. Obviously we do not know for sure if it was LE that have acquired this.
I'm also wondering about this. As usual, everything seems so confusing with this case!
It's far-fetched, it could be that they have suspects who are still alive and of whom we know nothing about, and this announcement is some kind of attempt to see if it causes any panic in any of those suspects thus eliminating some extra work.
Or then they are just extremely confident that the perpetrator is deceased and revealing new developments would make no difference.