Zodiackillersite.com

TY, Mr. Iowe! ! I've modified my "script" as follows: Z is a college student with the impotence scenario as given, and he's not married. He is able to achieve sexual satisfaction via Lover's Lane killings. With his last killing, that of Stine, Z discovers, to his horror (remember, this is 1970!) that murdering a man also gives him a tingle where he mingles. As serial killer, he claims the kill, but his murderous career is effectively over.

A movie should be as close to factual as possible. The killer is driven by inner demons. He kills when he is high on weekends. He was a special forces reject for mental reasons. He therefore sets out to prove to everyone that he can kill. He loves to taunt and prove how smart he is as he hates the police and he feels superior.. He is a loner. He hates his mom and his sexual orientation towards men. He is a white male of Norwegian decent.. and is attracted to the same. He moves at night and frequents movie houses and envisions himself in a limelight of death feared by a city he terrorized. He attacked the men first because they were the real targets. They were good looking, normal and had girls. The cab driver was killed after he asked to many questions..

that's all I have for ya good luck with the movie

TGOZ

I couldn't agree more TGOZ and that is why it is important to KNOW when you are stating facts. I think as a former detective, you would know how important that is.

YOU as an individual have come to your own conclusion, but those conclusions don't make it fact.

Tahoe, Yes you are so right and court of law decides that. but one thing for sure. it all starts with reasonable suspicion then evidence, not conjecture, enough of this reasonable evidence and ya get probable cause, Investigative ideas and suspects are born of such. I have mine and yall have yours. If I keep and open mind I can visit the evidence gathered by another websluth and decide for myself. If I don't i will be like others.. refusing to get off what is most likely a dead end road. That is why I'm here.. You?

That is great when that's how it is done. No problem with that what-so-ever and that is why we are all here. I just take note when folks make it sound like they already have the answers. I feel the need to emphasize when it appears someone might be throwing out statements like they are facts..that's all. Many, many people have come to this site doing such a thing and we like to keep it from going down that road. It is ALL alleged at this point.

Tahoe, You run your post. I'll run mine. Your suspicions have no greater weight than mine or vice versa. If you don't like my post
sorry, I have no opinion of yours yet. regards

the ghost of zodiac wrote:Tahoe, You run your post. I'll run mine. Your suspicions have no greater weight than mine or vice versa. If you don't like my post
sorry, I have no opinion of yours yet. regards

Of course they don't. But, I am a moderator here. Feel free to post all the "suspicions" you wish, but when/if those suspicions get posted as fact I and others will jump in.

If I interpreted your statement incorrectly, my apologies, but when you phrase things like "he is"...well, let's just say it's better to start it all out with "I believe he is...". It is an easy and appropriate request.

Hold on TGOZ, you do not state your opinions as fact at this forum. You preface your statements with IMO (in my opinion), perhaps, possibly or some other phrasing to indicate that what you are saying is not fact but, indeed, your opinion. Going by your lopsided logic the case should be solved and it is not. And if you mess with the mods and get snippy with them, you will find yourself no longer a member of this forum. We are here to make sure that people like yourself do not do exactly what you are doing.

I thought we are posting on a movie script in the first place not a factual thread seagull.. and I was not talking to you.. I was suggesting the plot to the new guy I agree with Tahoe, " in my opinion" would have been a great start..lesson learned