MMSox wrote:I’m assuming that would be enough for everyone to agree he killed her, but would it be enough for you to move him to the top of your Zodiac suspect list given that, the sketch, similar handwriting, etc?
MMSox wrote:I’m assuming that would be enough for everyone to agree he killed her, but would it be enough for you to move him to the top of your Zodiac suspect list given that, the sketch, similar handwriting, etc?
MMSox wrote:I’m not. I’m hopeful one of his relatives that has talked about him would help out if LE asked them.
morf13 wrote:MMSox wrote:I’m not. I’m hopeful one of his relatives that has talked about him would help out if LE asked them.
That's being worked on
JeffP wrote:MMSox wrote:I’m assuming that would be enough for everyone to agree he killed her, but would it be enough for you to move him to the top of your Zodiac suspect list given that, the sketch, similar handwriting, etc?
Yes. Because if he killed Cheri that means he wrote the letters too. Then he was in north when someone was killing girls (mostly) and writing letters. It would be too much of a coincidence.
AmerigoChattin wrote:JeffP wrote:MMSox wrote:I’m assuming that would be enough for everyone to agree he killed her, but would it be enough for you to move him to the top of your Zodiac suspect list given that, the sketch, similar handwriting, etc?
Yes. Because if he killed Cheri that means he wrote the letters too. Then he was in north when someone was killing girls (mostly) and writing letters. It would be too much of a coincidence.
Wait, why does it follow that the person who killed Cheri Jo also wrote Zodiac letters??
What special knowledge did the Cheri Jo killer have that appeared in Zodiac letters?
JeffP wrote:It just means that this would establish his M.O. being killing and writing letters. That's exactly what the Zodiac did.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests