by masootz » Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:05 am
i want the same thing as any reasonable person - proof that ross was zodiac or evidence that eliminates him.
my understanding of the evidence from strongest to weakest -
he generally fits the description
he is a viable suspect for bates' murder (lived in the area, went to the same school, had connections to her)
others who knew him considered it a possibility that he murdered bates, or otherwise could be a murderer
the le involved at the time thought enough of him to at least do some sort of background check
he was arrested for exposing himself or threatening someone (going off of memory, correct me if i'm wrong)
he had psychiatric issues
he disappeared for a few days after bates' murder
his brother (right?) reportedly told someone he thought ross could be zodiac
he took a class in cryptography
he spelled words wrong
he wore military boots
my understanding of the information that is lacking -
no evidence he lived, worked, or was ever in san francisco and no evidence of where he was during the necessary timeframe
no evidence that he was available during the timeframe of the attacks (we still don't know when he was incarcerated, right?)
no evidence that he owned cars or guns described in the attacks
rumor that he was schizophrenic, and we lack the information to know whether he had the mental capacity to complete the attacks, letters, codes, etc
no handwriting sample to make a comparison
nothing that connects him to anything related to the zodiac attacks, writing, codes, etc other than his connection to riverside/bates
is this a fair assessment?