Paul_Averly wrote:Well obviously Zodiac read that obscure magazine and copied the word twitch, misspelled it just like the real confession, even though the reproduction he copied was spelled correctly. Must have gotten lucky.
How did he also know to copy the double postage?How about copying the handwriting?
http://www.zodiackillersite.com/viewtop ... 397&p=1289Funny, I can see here that it looks the same. The copycat obviously based it on the desktop poem, but where did he read about that before the connection was made?
It would be more probable that the Riverside writer and the Zodiac writings were completely unrelated than Zodiac copying Riverside evidence in the very low chance LE would incorrectly connect it.
Might be nice to have you acknowledge your error after (having posted twice to Marshall) about the confession letter not having been published, as you say, until years after the Riverside connection. Instead you come back with sarcasm, but....whatever.
You need to go back and read. That "obscure magazine" got the reproduction from the newspaper in Riverside. And, the reproduction did NOT spell twitched correctly.
***
ONE stamp would not have been sufficient postage when it came to the Bates letters. The sender had to put two.
The only thing that bears any resemblance to Zodiac's handwriting is in the envelopes. Even those are probably similar to 90% of the POI's writing samples and probably a good portion of the students at RHS or RCC.
I have said for years I thought it possible Zodiac could have written the letters. Of course it's possible! I just think he got off claiming things he didn't do, or like Marshall states...it throws LE off track. Just like what he did with Kathleen Johns, who by the way, didn't seem to be describing Ross Sullivan. I say this because if one likes Ross as a suspect, than Zodiac's letter claiming KJ shows he took credit for crimes he didn't commit.