Tim Sullivan

[JeffP]

Never mind, I found it, H is for householder, not renter. So does the plot thicken? Or was it a typo?

Edit: looked at criss cross-

Bonniecc.jpg

Who is Ronne? Family?

-m

Since 2361 & 2361a both have last name, Bartlett, could it be that a Relative owned the home and it was a duplex?

They also had same phone number.

[Seagull]

I checked Ancestry and there is no such person as Ronne Bartlett. I think it may be a typo.

[morf13]

I checked Ancestry and there is no such person as Ronne Bartlett. I think it may be a typo.

A typo?

[doranchak]

If Bonnie moved to Canada in the late 60s, why is there still a B Bartlett in the 1972 directory?

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc ... 72_351.pdf



(I'm just assuming B Bartlett is Bonnie; could it be a relative?)

[doranchak]

From 1969 directory: Is this a different Tim Sullivan (at 25 Baker St, Apt 2)?



http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc ... 9_1954.pdf

[doranchak]

From 1968 directory, here's Bonnie and that Kenneth Vazeau fella again:



http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc ... 8_2095.pdf

[Seagull]

If Bonnie moved to Canada in the late 60s, why is there still a B Bartlett in the 1972 directory?

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc ... 72_351.pdf



(I'm just assuming B Bartlett is Bonnie; could it be a relative?)

I'm not to sure what to think about that. Since B Bartlett is at the same Jackson St. address I think we can be safe in assuming that the B stands for Bonnie. I suppose it's possible that there were two different Bonnie Bartlett's in SF at the same time. It's not a terribly unusual name. We do know that the 1370 California Apt. 206 is on her marriage license so maybe that's the address we should concentrate on?????

[doranchak]

"Bonnie" and "Ronne" Bartlett are again listed as two separate people in the 1967 directory:





http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc ... 67_289.pdf

[doranchak]

I'm not to sure what to think about that. Since B Bartlett is at the same Jackson St. address I think we can be safe in assuming that the B stands for Bonnie. I suppose it's possible that there were two different Bonnie Bartlett's in SF at the same time. It's not a terribly unusual name. We do know that the 1370 California Apt. 206 is on her marriage license so maybe that's the address we should concentrate on?????

Good point. Could very well be a different Bonnie Bartlett.

[JeffP]

From 1969 directory: Is this a different Tim Sullivan (at 25 Baker St, Apt 2)?



http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc ... 9_1954.pdf

Tim was a hippie. This was in Haight-Ashbury. If our Tim, this could put Ross in San Fran in 1969.