Dag MacLugh wrote:Marie:
Don't despair! Some months ago, I proposed a Group Project. Everyone thought it was a great idea, so long as I was the Group. One guy, probably a white supremacist, called me a "reneger." I counted to three billion, then returned to the Board.
Yes, there are anti-social types who post here. But, there are far more decent, intelligent contributors. And you, Marie, are one.
Stick around. We like you.
Dag
Thanks Dag, makes me feel productive and helpul

. And I have been in so many groups and organizations, I already know, theres the few you can depend on but usually it falls to you.
I have been doing lots of things behind the scenes, not to hide them, I just like confirmation before I post. Hopefully the info I need comes soon.
I am also guessing at this point, even if there was an autopsy of sorts, its been "misfiled." I do wonder, after looking at Ross's Death Certificate if there aren't samples somewhere (make DNA testing easier, but there are other ways). If foul play isn't suspected, he probably wan't at the top of the coroner's list. Nearly two months went by from his death to the release of the Death Certificate.
Heck, if all they did was a blood smear on a slide, and its well labeled, that might be all we need. (I do know they took samples at ALAs autopsy for further testing.) I don't know how long samples are kept, I think it depends on the lab/situations/storage etc. but I am betting somewhere there is some conclusively his DNA- though we might not need it.
Oh- one last thing, I looked up CA FOIA laws and unless there is an ongoing investigation/suspicious circumstances, autopsy reports can be foia-ed (unless they lost them, argh!). Which leads me to another thought I will post on the DNA forum...
-M