PinkPhantom wrote:Well I know AK shows proof here that Ted does reply. He did address the zodiac crimes and said he didn't do them and it was some man who died of natural causes. This may interest the Ross Sullivan crowd if Ted is telling the truth about what he was told happened to the Zodiac since Ross died of natural causes long ago.
However, you never know when someone may be willing to confess and who they confess to. I feel my unique position of being a female and somewhat attractive who shares many of his political ideals (though I don't condone his actions!) might give me an advantage in manipulating him. I studied quite a bit if psych after all. Would be interested in his feelings on a myriad of issues and not just the zodiac crimes. An interest in his general pursuits and ideals will leave him more open to possibly trusting me enough to tell me other lesser known crimes he had committed. I would love to just have a "Hello Clarice" experience with him and profile him though he would undoubtedly be simultaneously profiling me.
AK Wilks: I don't see how it could hurt to try. Remember Ted has an Einstein genius level IQ and beat the best of the FBI repeatedly outsmarting them. I don't think you will get much from him, but why not try? OK by me.Pink Phantom:
I also am seeking to obtain a resting Palm print from a TK letter to compare to the resting Palm print of Zodiac's that was obtained from the letters.
I wouldn't doubt TK has a baby dick

We are told Ted's prints were compared to cab prints Exorcist letter prints and did not match. Of course hundreds of people use a cab, and most of the letters came up negative for good prints, and any few that were there could be from postal service, police, reporters, lab techs, etc. CCCSD Crime Lab Chief Paul Holes told me doubts they have any real Z prints, and he would not dismiss an otherwise good suspect on the sole basis of a non-match to letter or cab prints.
Sure give it a shot. What political ideals do you think you and Ted share? Because his politics are not what the media generally portrays, so they may not be what you think.
Ted likes his status as a "political prisoner". He is a hero to many in the anarchist primitivists and radical environmental movements. He is discussed by some academics in the same vein as Che, Lenin, Bin Laden, etc. Ted will never admit to being Zodiac. Yes a dwindling few regard Z as a master criminal because he eluded police and created unbreakable codes. But to most Z is a sick serial killer. A sexually frustrated coward who gunned down and stabbed teens and young adults in lovers lanes. No political motivation, just a psycho. So IMO Ted will never admit to being Z, or EAR/ONS (if he is, it is more doubtful) or the Tylenol Killer.
This is what happened when Doug Oswell gave him the opportunity to confirm or disprove he was Zodiac.
AK Wilks:
Many years back Doug Oswell wrote the following letter to Ted Kaczynski asking for proof of an alibi for Zodiac murder and mailing dates. He never got an answer. Also, an attorney for Ted told a writer that they could not provide an alibi for any of these dates - not that they would not, but that they could not. The first Unabomber crime was in 1978, yet in the early seventies Ted recorded that he had already engaged in "violent rebellion" against society. In September 1966 Ted recorded the "breakthrough" moment in his life, when he decided to "REALLY kill everyone I hated".(Emphasis in original). The people he hated included "bigshots", scientists, big businessmen, police - but also "rowdy college students" promiscuous women who are "pigs, animals" and "noisy" love making couples.
Had Ted supplied an alibi for any of the key Z dates, that would end speculation about him being Z.
This is the letter:
Mr. Kaczynski:
My name is Douglas Oswell. For the past five years I have been researching the similarities between the Unabomber and a world-renowned criminal styled “Zodiac,” who became a pop-culture icon in the late 1960s through a series of sensational murders and correspondences with the press.
At this juncture I have uncovered no evidence that would forge a definite link between the activities of the Unabomber and those of Zodiac. Authorities at both the state and federal level have written off the likelihood of any such connection. Nevertheless it is undeniable (even by the detractors of a connection) that many similarities exist.
I have been advised that it would be unfair to suggest such a connection without offering you the opportunity to defend the reputation of the Unabomber and the philosophy for which he stood. To that end I would like to present you with a list of dates and ask that you provide accounts of your whereabouts for as many of those dates as possible. A valid alibi for even a single date, backed by documentary evidence, would be sufficient to prove conclusively that there is no linkage whatsoever between the sordid crimes of Zodiac and the more principled (albeit terrible) activities of the Unabomber.
Here is the list of dates in question:
Month
Day
Year
December
20
1968
July
4—5
1969
July
31
1969
August
1—8
1969
September
27
1969
October
11—13
1969
November
8—9
1969
December
20
1969
April
20
1970
April
28
1970
June
26
1970
July
24
1970
July
26
1970
October
5
1970
October
27
1970
March
13
1971
March
22
1971
Alibis for the following dates, while helpful, would not be conclusive in discounting a connection:
Month
Day
Year
June
3—6
1963
February
3—6
1964
October
30
1966
November
1
1966
April
30
1967
October
22
1969
March
22
1970
Please bear in mind that any alibi should be backed either by documentary evidence or the word of a reliable individual. In the latter case I would appreciate receiving from you a letter or letters of introduction that will establish my credibility to any such person.
It is only fair to state that I do not consider your brother, David Kaczynski, to be a reliable individual for the purpose of establishing an alibi. In 1990, based on conversations with your brother, a friend of his wrote a heretofore unpublished novel about “a Berkeley professor’s war with technology.” Within that novel the fictional "Berkeley professor" committed murder to promote his worldview, thus anticipating the actual truth long before the Unabomber entered the public imagination.
Whatever the case, I will publish your response in such a way that it may be freely accessed by any interested person.
There is an advantage to you in this. The entire world is aware that you have risked your life to disprove the notion that the Unabomber’s actions were not philosophically motivated, but simply the result of a deviant or warped psychology. I must frankly tell you that the postulated linkage between Zodiac and the Unabomber has grown and persisted in the past five years. Indeed, it shows signs of strengthening in the years to come. I fear that if this theory is not thoroughly refuted, posterity will know the Unabomber not for his principled stand against technology, but for his similarity to a sick and sordid criminal who murdered minor children to assuage his sexual frustrations and shore up a foundering ego. The Zodiac Killer is widely known as “America’s Jack the Ripper.” The Unabomber is fast becoming the “favorite suspect" in a mystery that, because it remains unsolved, will endure for many years to come. You alone can divest him of that distinction.
I thank you for your attention to this matter and encourage you to respond. Enclosed is a small amount of money ($5.00) to defray the cost of postage and stationery.
Sincerely,
Douglas E. Oswell
-------------------------------------
Doug told me he never got a reply to this letter.
If TK was NOT the Zodiac, it would be so easy for him to blow this whole idea out of the water, by producing a timecard, a paycheck, class attendance sheet, a letter, a postmarked envelope, a photograph, a witness.Doug told me another writer got a response from Ted's attorney that NO ALIBI for the above dates could be produced. Not wouldn't produce, but could not produce. Linda
Sounds like the letter must have gotten through if someone got a response from Ted's attorney regarding no alibi being available. I've always found it interesting that in the Unabomber case itself, the period of time from Ted's college years until 1978 seem to be brushed over. If there had been a trial, maybe some more about these years would have come out, but since he plead guilty, these years are presented almost as a blur...
AK WILKS:
onewhoknows asked: "Dear AK have you ever sent a letter to TK and asked him if he is the Zodiac? Just wondering"
AK: I have not yet, but in the first post you can see what happened when Doug Oswell did.
Ted did not respond.
This still cracks me up!
Apparently Ted Kaczynski is the only person left in the world besides Robert Graysmith who thinks Allen was the Zodiac.
Ted relies on the fact that according to him "law enforcement authorities concluded I had no connection with the Zodiac case."
Yep thats Ted, always a big believer in how right the law enforcement authorities are! This from the man who constantly said how stupid police were, who said the "FBI isn't going to catch [me] anytime soon. The FBI is a joke."
