Re: Kaczynski, the Harvard Experiments and MK- ULTRA

Posted:
Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:06 pm
by AK Wilks
Can you repost the first pages? So people can read them all? Thanks.
Re: Kaczynski, the Harvard Experiments and MK- ULTRA

Posted:
Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:47 pm
by AK Wilks
These documents are chilling, blandly contemplating using people for assassinations.
Re: Kaczynski, the Harvard Experiments and MK- ULTRA

Posted:
Mon Feb 16, 2015 10:44 pm
by AK Wilks
Darla Jones has an excellent post in the Zodiac Theories section about possible influences of the Process Church and Norse Myths and Runes on Zodiac here:
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=2202Ted also had an interest in Norse runes and myths as I have discussed before.
In that post she also discusses MK-ULTRA and possible links between Zodiac and EAR/ONS.
Re: Kaczynski, the Harvard Experiments and MK- ULTRA

Posted:
Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:00 pm
by Darla Jones
This book claims that Zodiac was a cover for the RFK assassination. This is an interesting twist to the research I have been doing on MK Ultra. I tried to find it posted on this site. Has anyone else seen this book?
https://books.google.com/books?id=-PkgG ... &q&f=false
Re: Kaczynski, the Harvard Experiments and MK- ULTRA

Posted:
Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:18 am
by Seagull
Darla Jones wrote:This book claims that Zodiac was a cover for the RFK assassination. This is an interesting twist to the research I have been doing on MK Ultra. I tried to find it posted on this site. Has anyone else seen this book?
https://books.google.com/books?id=-PkgG ... &q&f=false
There is a thread on the book here-
viewtopic.php?f=90&t=1051I have the book but it's so convoluted that I never finished reading it.
Re: Kaczynski, the Harvard Experiments and MK- ULTRA

Posted:
Thu Mar 26, 2015 1:56 pm
by Norse
Going by the available samples, I'd say it seems like the author has done very poor research - relying on Graysmith as a source of accurate information is obviously a rookie mistake in the Z context.
It's poorly written too, in my opinion.
As for Darlene Ferrin and the many outlandish ideas about who or what she "really" was - let's just say I don't believe in over-complicating things. If she was in fact a CIA agent - or whatever - I personally think someone would have found out by now, given the scrutiny her life has been subject to, and been able to demonstrate it beyond doubt too.
The only thing missing now is a book about Darlene being Z himself, or rather herself - staging her own death, etc. I wouldn't be surprised in the least. And I wouldn't pay to read that book either.